ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the Capilia TB-Neo assay.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Mutations in MPT64 Secretory Protein ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Mutation in MPT64 gene influencing diagnostic accuracy of SD Bioline assay (capilia).BMC infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Dynamics of tuberculosis in Wau, South Sudan during a period of armed conflict.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2018Article
- Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Mycobacteria.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2018Review
- Diagnosis of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: Discordant results by diagnostic methods.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2018Article
- Prevalence of tuberculous lesion in cattle slaughtered in Mubende district, Uganda.BMC veterinary research · 2017Article
- Comparative evaluation of three immunochromatographic identification tests for culture confirmation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.BMC infectious diseases · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance of the Capilia TB-Neo assay, a new-generation assay, was assessed by determining its sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and cross-reaction with contaminating organisms. The sensitivity and specificity were 99.2 and 96.4% and 89.3 and 100% in pure and mixed-culture isolates, respectively. The kappa statistic was 95.0 and 77.9% in pure and mixed culture isolates, respectively. There was no cross-reaction with contaminating organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.