Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24108448›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2013

Automated determination of metastases in unstructured radiology reports for eligibility screening in oncology clinical trials.

Valentina I Petkov, Lynne T Penberthy, Bassam A Dahman, Andrew Poklepovic, Chris W Gillam, James H McDermott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Text Classification of Cancer Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Natural Language Processing for EHR-Based Computational Phenotyping.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valentina I PetkovMassey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, 23298, USA.
Lynne T Penberthy
Bassam A Dahman
Andrew Poklepovic
Chris W Gillam
James H McDermott

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Keri R Maher · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
NCI NIH HHS 5 P30CA016059NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enrolling adequate numbers of patients that meet protocol eligibility criteria in a timely manner is critical, yet clinical trial accrual continues to be problematic. One approach to meet these accrual challenges is to utilize technology to automatically screen patients for clinical trial eligibility. This manuscript reports on the evaluation of different automated approaches to determine the metastatic status from unstructured radiology reports using the Clinical Trials Eligibility Database Integrated System (CTED). The study sample included all patients (N = 5,523) with radiologic diagnostic studies (N = 10,492) completed in a two-week period. Eight search algorithms (queries) within CTED were developed and applied to radiology reports. The performance of each algorithm was compared to a reference standard which consisted of a physician's review of the radiology reports. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predicted values were calculated for each algorithm. The number of patients identified by each algorithm varied from 187 to 330 and the number of true positive cases confirmed by physician review ranged from 171 to 199 across the algorithms. The best performing algorithm had sensitivity 94%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 90%, negative predictive value 100%, and accuracy of 99%. Our evaluation process identified the optimal method for rapid identification of patients with metastatic disease through automated screening of unstructured radiology reports. The methods developed using the CTED system could be readily implemented at other institutions to enhance the efficiency of research staff in the clinical trials eligibility screening process.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAutomationClinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSensitivity and SpecificityautomationClinical trialseligibility screeninginformation extractionmetastasesradiology reports

Identifiers

PMID24108448
PMCPMC4358809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.