Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24108252›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesia and analgesia2013

Liposomal bupivacaine as a single-injection peripheral nerve block: a dose-response study.

Brian M Ilfeld, Nisha Malhotra, Timothy J Furnish, Michael C Donohue, Sarah J Madison

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01349140 phase1completednot on this map

EXPAREL Dose-Response for Single-Injection Femoral Nerve Blocks: A Pharmacodynamics Investigation in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2012 to 2012Enrolled14ConditionsHealthy VolunteersArmsSKY0402
NCT02624856 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Allocation Concealed Study Comparing the Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Over Standard Bupivacaine Plus Dexamethasone in Quadriceps Sparing Femoral Nerve Block and Wound Infiltration for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbany Medical CollegeRan2015 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Pain, PostoperativeArmsLiposomal bupivacaine, Bupivacaine plus dexamethasone
NCT03574376 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Protocol for a Single Center Randomized Controlled Trial of Liposomal Bupivacaine Intercostal Nerve Blockade Versus Continuous Thoracic Epidural for Regional Analgesia in Patients With Multiple Rib Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorChadrick EvansRan2018 to 2021Enrolled258ConditionsTrauma, Trauma Injury, Pain, AcuteArmsBupivacaine Liposome Injection, Bupivacaine
NCT03975283 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Use of Long-acting Local Analgesia in Bariatrics: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled80ConditionsPost Operative PainArmsExparel 266 MG Per 20 ML Injection, Bupivacaine Hcl 0.25% Inj
NCT07254650 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Three-Arm Clinical Trial: The Study of Liposomal Bupivacaine Via Intercostal Nerve Block, Serratus Anterior Plane Block, or Combination Block for Pain Control After Robotic Thoracic Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2026 to 2028Enrolled300ConditionsLung Cancer (Diagnosis)ArmsArm 1 "LipoB-I": Liposomal Bupivacaine via Multi-Level Intercostal Nerve Block, Arm 2 "LipoB-S": Liposomal Bupivacaine via Serratus Anterior Plane Block, Arm 3 "LipoB-C": Liposomal Bupivacaine Administered via Combination Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Newer drug delivery systems in anesthesia.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian M IlfeldFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Nisha Malhotra
Timothy J Furnish
Michael C Donohue
Sarah J Madison

Funding

SAN DIEGO CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTEUL1RR031980 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S · 2010 to 2011
$14.0M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031980NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR031980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently available local anesthetics approved for single-injection peripheral nerve blocks have a maximum duration of <24 hours. A liposomal bupivacaine formulation (EXPAREL, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA), releasing bupivacaine over 96 hours, recently gained Food and Drug Administration approval exclusively for wound infiltration but not peripheral nerve blocks.

methodsBilateral single-injection femoral nerve blocks were administered in healthy volunteers (n = 14). For each block, liposomal bupivacaine (0-80 mg) was mixed with normal saline to produce 30 mL of study fluid. Each subject received 2 different doses, 1 on each side, applied randomly in a double-masked fashion. The end points included the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the quadriceps femoris muscle and tolerance to cutaneous electrical current in the femoral nerve distribution. Measurements were performed from baseline until quadriceps MVIC returned to 80% of baseline bilaterally.

resultsThere were statistically significant dose responses in MVIC (0.09%/mg, SE = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.14, P = 0.002) and tolerance to cutaneous current (-0.03 mA/mg, SE = 0.01, 95% CI, -0.04 to -0.02, P < 0.001), however, in the opposite direction than expected (the higher the dose, the lower the observed effect). This inverse relationship is biologically implausible and most likely due to the limited sample size and the subjective nature of the measurement instruments. While peak effects occurred within 24 hours after block administration in 75% of cases (95% CI, 43%-93%), block duration usually lasted much longer: for bupivacaine doses >40 mg, tolerance to cutaneous current did not return to within 20% above baseline until after 24 hours in 100% of subjects (95% CI, 56%-100%). MVIC did not consistently return to within 20% of baseline until after 24 hours in 90% of subjects (95% CI, 54%-100%). Motor block duration was not correlated with bupivacaine dose (0.06 hour/mg, SE = 0.14, 95% CI, -0.27 to 0.39, P = 0.707).

conclusionsThe results of this investigation suggest that deposition of a liposomal bupivacaine formulation adjacent to the femoral nerve results in a partial sensory and motor block of >24 hours for the highest doses examined. However, the high variability of block magnitude among subjects and inverse relationship of dose and response magnitude attests to the need for a phase 3 study with a far larger sample size, and that these results should be viewed as suggestive, requiring confirmation in a future trial.

Indexed as

AdultAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineCohort StudiesDelayed-Action PreparationsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CarriersFemaleHumansLiposomesMaleNerve BlockPeripheral Nervous SystemTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CarriersLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID24108252
PMCPMC3808480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.