Trial reportAnnals of surgery2015
Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01685775 (Needlescopic Versus Transvaginal/Transumbilical Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Needlescopic Versus Transvaginal/Transumbilical Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Guideline
- Safety of transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Pooled it
- Magnetic Surgery: Results From First Prospective Clinical Trial in 50 Patients.Annals of surgery · 2018Trial
- Single-port laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: experiences with more than 300 consecutive patients.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Trial
- Systematic analysis of the safety and benefits of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Trial
- Trial
- [Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014Trial
- Transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy--results of a randomized clinical trial after 6 months.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2014Trial
- Postoperative pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Trial
- Worldwide research tendencies on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Research progress in the treatment of gallstones with laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery: a narrative review.BMC surgery · 2025Review
- Evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a narrative review.BMC surgery · 2024Review
- Endoscopic Management of Benign Gallbladder Diseases.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Does transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery affect female sexual function?: a prospective cohort study.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- [Clinical value of alternative technologies to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy - single port, reduced port, robotics, NOTES].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Does a prior hysterectomy complicate transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy?-a comparative analysis of prospectively collected data.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
- Transvaginal Hybrid-NOTES procedures-do they have a negative impact on pregnancy and delivery?Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Observational
- Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Advances and Trends in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- MIEO: a micro-invasive endoscopic operation port system for transluminal interventions-an acute and survival porcine study.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFor cholecystectomy, both the needlescopic cholecystectomy (NC) 3-trocar technique using 2 to 3 mm trocars and the umbilical-assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) technique have found their way into clinical routine. This study compares these 2 techniques in female patients who are in need of an elective cholecystectomy.
backgroundNatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a surgical concept permitting scarless intra-abdominal operations through natural orifices, such as the vagina. Because of the lack of an adequately powered trial, we designed this first randomized controlled study for the comparison of TVC and NC.
methodsThis prospective, randomized, nonblinded, single-center trial evaluates the safety and effectiveness of TVC (intervention), compared with NC (control) in female patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. The primary endpoint was intensity of pain until the morning of postoperative day (POD) 2. Secondary outcomes were among others intra- and postoperative complications, procedural time, amount of analgesics used, pain intensity until POD 10, duration of hospital stay, satisfaction with the aesthetic result, and quality of life on POD 10 as quantified with the Eypasch Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).
resultsBetween February 2010 and June 2012, 40 patients were randomly assigned to the interventional or control group. All patients completed follow-up. Procedural time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and the rate of intra- and postoperative complications were similar in the 2 groups. However, significant advantages were found for the transvaginal access regarding pain until POD 2, but also until POD 10 (P = 0.043 vs P = 0.010) despite significantly less use of peripheral analgesics (P = 0.019). In the TVC group, patients were significantly more satisfied with the aesthetic result (P < 0.001) and had a significantly better GIQLI (P = 0.028).
conclusionsAlthough comparable in terms of safety, TVC caused less pain, increased satisfaction with the aesthetic result, and improved postoperative quality of life in the short term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.