Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24108196›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2015

Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.

Dirk Rolf Bulian, Jürgen Knuth, Nicola Cerasani, Axel Sauerwald, Rolf Lefering, Markus Maria Heiss

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01685775 (Needlescopic Versus Transvaginal/Transumbilical Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01685775 nacompletednot on this map

Needlescopic Versus Transvaginal/Transumbilical Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Witten/HerdeckeRan2010 to 2012Enrolled40ConditionsCalculus of Gallbladder With or Without Cholecystitis, Laparoscopic CholecystectomyArmsTransvaginal/transumbilical, Needlescopic with 3 trocars
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. [Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Endoscopic Management of Benign Gallbladder Diseases.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dirk Rolf Bulian*Department of Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany †Department for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Holweide Hospital, Cologne, Germany; and ‡Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Jürgen Knuth
Nicola Cerasani
Axel Sauerwald
Rolf Lefering
Markus Maria Heiss
Witten/Herdecke University · DEKrankenhaus Köln-Holweide · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFor cholecystectomy, both the needlescopic cholecystectomy (NC) 3-trocar technique using 2 to 3 mm trocars and the umbilical-assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) technique have found their way into clinical routine. This study compares these 2 techniques in female patients who are in need of an elective cholecystectomy.

backgroundNatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a surgical concept permitting scarless intra-abdominal operations through natural orifices, such as the vagina. Because of the lack of an adequately powered trial, we designed this first randomized controlled study for the comparison of TVC and NC.

methodsThis prospective, randomized, nonblinded, single-center trial evaluates the safety and effectiveness of TVC (intervention), compared with NC (control) in female patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. The primary endpoint was intensity of pain until the morning of postoperative day (POD) 2. Secondary outcomes were among others intra- and postoperative complications, procedural time, amount of analgesics used, pain intensity until POD 10, duration of hospital stay, satisfaction with the aesthetic result, and quality of life on POD 10 as quantified with the Eypasch Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).

resultsBetween February 2010 and June 2012, 40 patients were randomly assigned to the interventional or control group. All patients completed follow-up. Procedural time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and the rate of intra- and postoperative complications were similar in the 2 groups. However, significant advantages were found for the transvaginal access regarding pain until POD 2, but also until POD 10 (P = 0.043 vs P = 0.010) despite significantly less use of peripheral analgesics (P = 0.019). In the TVC group, patients were significantly more satisfied with the aesthetic result (P < 0.001) and had a significantly better GIQLI (P = 0.028).

conclusionsAlthough comparable in terms of safety, TVC caused less pain, increased satisfaction with the aesthetic result, and improved postoperative quality of life in the short term.

Indexed as

AdultCholecystectomyCholecystolithiasisFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsLength of StayMiddle AgedNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryNeedlesPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24108196
PMCPMC4337615
OpenAlexW2008231767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.