Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24108116›Full record

ArticlePediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2013

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus counterpulsatile, pulsatile, and continuous left ventricular unloading for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.

Carlo R Bartoli, Steven C Koenig, Constantine Ionan, Kevin J Gillars, Mike E Mitchell, Erle H Austin, Laman A Gray, George M Pantalos

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlo R Bartoli1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, PA. 2MD/PhD Program, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY. 3Cardiovascular Innovation Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. 4Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. 5Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Steven C Koenig
Constantine Ionan
Kevin J Gillars
Mike E Mitchell
Erle H Austin
Laman A Gray
George M Pantalos
University of Louisville · USCardiovascular Innovation Institute · US

Funding

ALTERNATIVES TO ECMO FOR PEDIATRIC CIRCULATORY SUPPORTR01HL061696 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PANTALOS, GEORGE M · 1999 to 2002
$385k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1-R01-HL61696NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL061696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite progress with adult ventricular assist devices, limited options exist to support pediatric patients with life-threatening heart disease. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remains the clinical standard. To characterize (patho)physiologic responses to different modes of mechanical unloading of the failing pediatric heart, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was compared to intra-aortic balloon pump, pulsatile-flow ventricular assist device, or continuous-flow ventricular assist device support in a pediatric heart failure model.

designExperimental.

settingLarge animal laboratory operating room. SUBJECTS: Yorkshire piglets (n = 47; 11.7 ± 2.6 kg).

interventionsIn piglets with coronary ligation-induced cardiac dysfunction, mechanical circulatory support devices were implanted and studied during maximum support. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsLeft ventricular, right ventricular, coronary, carotid, systemic arterial, and pulmonary arterial hemodynamics were measured with pressure and flow transducers. Myocardial oxygen consumption and total-body oxygen consumption were calculated from arterial, venous, and coronary sinus blood sampling. Blood flow was measured in 17 organs with microspheres. Paired Student t tests compared baseline and heart failure conditions. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance compared heart failure, device support mode(s), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) findings included 1) an improved left ventricular blood supply/demand ratio during pulsatile-flow ventricular assist device, continuous-flow ventricular assist device, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation but not intra-aortic balloon pump support, 2) an improved global myocardial blood supply/demand ratio during pulsatile-flow ventricular assist device and continuous-flow ventricular assist device but not intra-aortic balloon pump or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and 3) diminished pulsatility during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous-flow ventricular assist device but not intra-aortic balloon pump and pulsatile-flow ventricular assist device support. A profile of systems-based responses was established for each type of support.

conclusionsEach type of pediatric ventricular assist device provided hemodynamic support by unloading the heart with a different mechanism that created a unique profile of physiological changes. These data contribute novel, clinically relevant insight into pediatric mechanical circulatory support and establish an important resource for pediatric device development and patient selection.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHemodynamicsIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingAnimalsAortaCarotid ArteriesCoronary VesselsHeart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureHeart VentriclesOxygen ConsumptionPulsatile FlowRenal CirculationSwine

Identifiers

PMID24108116
PMCPMC3913264
OpenAlexW2111839190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.