Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24107707›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2013

Spt6: two fundamentally distinct functions in the regulation of histone modification.

Hiroaki Kato, Kosuke Okazaki, Takeshi Urano

Open access · hybridAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroaki KatoDepartment of Biochemistry; Shimane University School of Medicine; Izumo, Japan; PRESTO; Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST); Saitama, Japan.
Kosuke OkazakiDepartment of Biochemistry; Shimane University School of Medicine; Izumo, Japan.
Takeshi UranoDepartment of Biochemistry; Shimane University School of Medicine; Izumo, Japan.
Shimane University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As posttranslational modifications of histones H3 and H4 determine the state of chromatin in cis, these histones should remain attached to template DNA during transcription in order to maintain the state of chromatin. RNA polymerase II itself can transcribe the nucleosome template without changing nucleosome positioning. However, it was uncertain whether Spt6, a highly conserved polymerase-associated histone chaperone, prevents "preexisting" histone molecules from being dissociated from template DNA during transcription. We recently showed that Spt6 prevents transcription-coupled loss of posttranslationally modified histone H3. Taking previous studies into account, we would like to propose here that Spt6 has two fundamentally distinct functions in the regulation of histone modification: one is to act as a platform for histone modifiers and the other is to act as a molecular liaison between histone molecules and template DNA to prevent cotranscriptional dissociation of preexisting histones in order to maintain locus-specific modifications.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalTranscription, GeneticHistone ChaperonesHistonesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsHistone ChaperonesHistonesSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteinsepigeneticshistone methylationposttranslational modificationsRNA polymerase IISpt6

Identifiers

PMID24107707
PMCPMC3933485
OpenAlexW2050740775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.