Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24107634›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2013

A small ubiquitin binding domain inhibits ubiquitin-dependent protein recruitment to DNA repair foci.

Corey M Helchowski, Laura F Skow, Katelyn H Roberts, Colleen L Chute, Christine E Canman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Decoding histone ubiquitylation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reading chromatin signatures after DNA double-strand breaks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corey M HelchowskiDepartment of Pharmacology; University of Michigan Medical School; Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Laura F SkowDepartment of Pharmacology; University of Michigan Medical School; Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Katelyn H RobertsDepartment of Pharmacology; University of Michigan Medical School; Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Colleen L ChuteDepartment of Pharmacology; University of Michigan Medical School; Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Christine E CanmanDepartment of Pharmacology; University of Michigan Medical School; Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Ann Arbor Center for Independent Living · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Training Program in Tumor MicroenvironmentT32CA009676 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Maria G Castro, Analisa Virginia DiFeo · 1992 to 2026
$7.3M
Novel mechanisms by which REV1 and POLZ affect response to anticancer agentsR01CA133046 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CANMAN, CHRISTINE ELIZABETH · 2008 to 2018
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA133046NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133046NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid ubiquitination of chromatin surrounding DNA double-stranded breaks (DSB) drives the formation of large structures called ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF), comprising many DNA damage response (DDR) proteins. This process is regulated by RNF8 and RNF168 ubiquitin ligases and is thought to be necessary for DNA repair and activation of signaling pathways involved in regulating cell cycle checkpoints. Here we demonstrate that it is possible to interfere with ubiquitin-dependent recruitment of DDR factors by expressing proteins containing ubiquitin binding domains (UBDs) that bind to lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chains. Expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RAD18 prevented chromatin spreading of 53BP1 at DSBs, and this phenomenon was dependent upon the integrity of the RAD18 UBD. An isolated RAD18 UBD interfered with 53BP1 chromatin spreading, as well as other important DDR mediators, including RAP80 and the BRCA1 tumor suppressor protein, consistent with the model that the RAD18 UBD is blocking access of proteins to ubiquitinated chromatin. Using the RAD18 UBD as a tool to impede localization of 53BP1 and BRCA1 to repair foci, we found that DDR signaling, DNA DSB repair, and radiosensitivity were unaffected. We did find that activated ATM (S1981P) and phosphorylated SMC1 (a specific target of ATM) were not detectable in DNA repair foci, in addition to upregulated homologous recombination repair, revealing 2 DDR responses that are dependent upon chromatin spreading of certain DDR factors at DSBs. These data demonstrate that select UBDs containing targeting motifs may be useful probes in determining the biological significance of protein-ubiquitin interactions.

Indexed as

DNA RepairBRCA1 ProteinCarrier ProteinsCell LineChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHistone ChaperonesHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsRadiation ToleranceRecombinational DNA RepairTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1UbiquitinBRCA1 ProteinCarrier ProteinsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsHistone ChaperonesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNuclear ProteinsRAD18 protein, humanTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1UbiquitinUbiquitin-Protein LigasesUIMC1 protein, humanATMBRCA1DNA damage responsehomologous recombinationRAD18RAP80ubiquitin

Identifiers

PMID24107634
PMCPMC3905067
OpenAlexW2064551980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.