ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2013
At-risk but viable myocardium in a large animal model of non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: cardiovascular magnetic resonance with ex vivo validation.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- T-Wave Abnormality as Electrocardiographic Signature of Myocardial Edema in Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2014.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2015Review
- Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) have varying degrees of salvageable myocardium at risk of irreversible injury. We hypothesized that a novel model of NSTE-ACS produces acute myocardial injury, measured by increased T2 cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), without significant necrosis by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).
methodsIn a canine model, partial coronary stenosis was created and electrodes placed on the epicardium. Myocardial T2, an indicator of at-risk myocardium, was measured pre- and post-tachycardic pacing.
resultsSerum troponin-I (TnI) was not detectable in unoperated sham animals but averaged 1.97 ± 0.72 ng/mL in model animals. Coronary stenosis and pacing produced significantly higher T2 in the affected vs. the remote myocardium (53.2 ± 4.9 vs. 43.6 ± 2.8 ms, p < 0.01) with no evident injury by LGE. Microscopy revealed no significant irreversible cellular injury. Relative respiration rate (RRR) of affected vs. remote myocardial tissue was significantly lower in model vs. sham animals (0.72 ± 0.07 vs. 1.04 ± 0.07, p < 0.001). Lower RRR corresponded to higher final TnI levels (R(2) = 0.83, p = 0.004) and changes in CaMKIID and mitochondrial gene expression.
conclusionsA large animal NSTE-ACS model with mild TnI elevation and without ST elevation, similar to the human syndrome, demonstrates signs of acute myocardial injury by T2-CMR without significant irreversible damage. Reduced tissue respiration and associated adaptations of critical metabolic pathways correspond to increased myocardial injury by serum biomarkers in this model. T2-CMR as a biomarker of at-risk but salvageable myocardium warrants further consideration in preclinical and clinical studies of NSTE-ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.