Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24107468›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2013

Detection of serological biomarkers by proximity extension assay for detection of colorectal neoplasias in symptomatic individuals.

Stine Buch Thorsen, Martin Lundberg, Andrea Villablanca, Sarah Louise T Christensen, Kirstine Christensen Belling, Birgitte Sander Nielsen, Mick Knowles, Nick Gee, Hans Jørgen Nielsen, Nils Brünner and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Proteomics appending a complementary dimension to precision oncotherapy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Stine Buch ThorsenDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. stenvang@sund.ku.dk.
Martin Lundberg
Andrea Villablanca
Sarah Louise T Christensen
Kirstine Christensen Belling
Birgitte Sander Nielsen
Mick Knowles
Nick Gee
Hans Jørgen Nielsen
Nils Brünner
Ib Jarle Christensen
Simon Fredriksson
Jan Stenvang
Erika Assarsson
University of Copenhagen · DKOlink Bioscience (Sweden) · SEBabraham Bioscience Technologies (United Kingdom) · GBBioscience (Slovakia) · SKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the potential of biomarkers to aid in early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is recognized and numerous biomarker candidates have been reported in the literature, to date only few molecular markers have been approved for daily clinical use.

methodsIn order to improve the translation of biomarkers from the bench to clinical practice we initiated a biomarker study focusing on a novel technique, the proximity extension assay, with multiplexing capability and the possible additive effect obtained from biomarker panels. We performed a screening of 74 different biomarkers in plasma derived from a case-control sample set consisting of symptomatic individuals representing CRC patients, patients with adenoma, patients with non-neoplastic large bowel diseases and healthy individuals.

resultsAfter statistical evaluation we found 12 significant indicators of CRC and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Transferrin Receptor-1 (TFRC), Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), Osteopontin (OPN/SPP1) and cancer antigen 242 (CA242) showed additive effect. This biomarker panel identified CRC patients with a sensitivity of 56% at 90% specificity and thus the performance is sufficiently high to further investigate this combination of five proteins as serological biomarkers for detection of CRC. Furthermore, when applying the indicators to identify early-stage CRC a combination of CEA, TFRC and CA242 resulted in a ROC curve with an area under the curve of 0.861.

conclusionsFive plasma protein biomarkers were found to be potential CRC discriminators and three of these were additionally found to be discriminators of early-stage CRC. These explorative data in symptomatic individuals demonstrates the feasibility of the multiplex proximity extension assay for screening of potential serological protein biomarkers and warrants independent analyses in a larger sample cohort, including asymptomatic individuals, to further validate the performances of our CRC biomarker panel.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiological AssayBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24107468
PMCPMC3827929
OpenAlexW2117930220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.