Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24107446›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2013

Microtubule dynamics control tail retraction in migrating vascular endothelial cells.

Anutosh Ganguly, Hailing Yang, Hong Zhang, Fernando Cabral, Kamala D Patel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. TaxolInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Colchicine--Update on mechanisms of action and therapeutic uses.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anutosh GangulyCorresponding Authors: Kamala D. Patel, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary T2N 4N1, Alberta, Canada. kpatel@ucalgary.ca.
Hailing Yang
Hong Zhang
Fernando Cabral
Kamala D Patel
University of Calgary · CAThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

TUBULIN MUTATIONS AND PACLITAXEL RESISTANCER01CA085935 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CABRAL, FERNANDO R · 2000 to 2010
$2.7M
CIHR MOP-14180NCI NIH HHS CA85935NCI NIH HHS R01 CA085935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drugs that target microtubules are potent inhibitors of angiogenesis, but their mechanism of action is not well understood. To explore this, we treated human umbilical vein endothelial cells with paclitaxel, vinblastine, and colchicine and measured the effects on microtubule dynamics and cell motility. In general, lower drug concentrations suppressed microtubule dynamics and inhibited cell migration whereas higher concentrations were needed to inhibit cell division; however, surprisingly, large drug-dependent differences were seen in the relative concentrations needed to inhibit these two processes. Suppression of microtubule dynamics did not significantly affect excursions of lamellipodia away from the nucleus or prevent cells from elongating; but, it did inhibit retraction of the trailing edges that are normally enriched in dynamic microtubules, thereby limiting cell locomotion. Complete removal of microtubules with a high vinblastine concentration caused a loss of polarity that resulted in roundish, rather than elongated, cells, rapid but nondirectional membrane activity, and little cell movement. The results are consistent with a model in which more static microtubules stabilize the leading edge of migrating cells, whereas more dynamic microtubules locate to the rear where they can remodel and allow tail retraction. Suppressing microtubule dynamics interferes with tail retraction, but removal of microtubules destroys the asymmetry needed for cell elongation and directional motility. The prediction that suppressing microtubule dynamics might be sufficient to prevent angiogenesis was supported by showing that low concentrations of paclitaxel could prevent the formation of capillary-like structures in an in vitro tube formation assay.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionCell MovementColchicineEndothelial CellsHumansMicrotubulesPaclitaxelTubulin ModulatorsVinblastineColchicinePaclitaxelTubulin ModulatorsVinblastine

Identifiers

PMID24107446
PMCPMC4011668
OpenAlexW2101657719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.