Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24107190›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2013

Identifying women at risk for delayed presentation of breast cancer: a cross-sectional study in Estonia.

Kaire Innos, Peeter Padrik, Vahur Valvere, Evelyn Eelma, Riina Kütner, Jaak Lehtsaar, Mare Tekkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Factors influencing symptom appraisal and help-seeking of older adults with possible cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaire InnosDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia. kaire.innos@tai.ee.
Peeter Padrik
Vahur Valvere
Evelyn Eelma
Riina Kütner
Jaak Lehtsaar
Mare Tekkel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival from breast cancer remains lower in Estonia than in most other European countries. More advanced stage and larger tumors that have impact on survival may be a result of delay in seeking help for breast cancer symptoms. The aim of this study was to identify determinants of delayed presentation among breast cancer patients in Estonia.

methodsThe study population included women with primary breast cancer diagnosed in Estonia in 2008-2010. All data were collected using structured personal interviews carried out by trained nurses in the hospital setting. Only patients with self-discovered symptoms were included in this analysis. Patient delay was measured as time elapsing from symptom self-discovery to first medical consultation. The effect of different factors on the likelihood of prolonged delay (>90 days) was evaluated using logistic regression.

resultsAmong 703 eligible patients, median patient delay was 16 days (interquartile range 5-54 days). Seventeen percent of the patients had their first medical consultation more than three months after self-detection of symptoms. In multivariate analysis, the risk of prolonged delay was significantly associated with age 65 years and over (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.23-4.20), current smoking (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.21-3.61), symptoms other than painless breast lump or breast pain (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.08-3.16), no history of mammograms (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.13-2.95), having received no information on breast cancer during past year (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.05-2.99), and previous benign breast problems (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.01-2.67). Non-significant risk increase was seen with lower education.

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that factors associated with delayed presentation of breast cancer in Eastern Europe are similar to those observed in Western countries. The results suggest that educational messages to general population should aim at increasing awareness of "non-lump" symptoms of breast cancer and encouraging women of all ages to present in a timely manner. Women at risk for delayed presentation such as smokers and women with no history of mammograms could be identified in the primary care setting.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisPatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEstoniaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLogistic ModelsMammographyMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24107190
PMCPMC3852399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.