Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24106785›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2013

Effect of sodium ions on RNA duplex stability.

Zexiang Chen, Brent M Znosko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reparameterization of the Amber RNA Force Field Non-Bonded Terms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Blind tests of RNA nearest-neighbor energy prediction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zexiang ChenDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University , 3501 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, United States.
Brent M Znosko

Funding

Understanding the Thermodynamics and Structure of RNA Secondary Structure MotifsR15GM085699 · NIGMS · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI ZNOSKO, BRENT · 2009 to 2025
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM085699NIGMS NIH HHS R15GM085699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard sodium concentration for RNA optical melting experiments is 1.021 M. Algorithms that predict Tm, ΔG°37, and secondary structure from sequence generally rely on parameters derived from optical melting experiments performed in 1.021 M sodium. Physiological monovalent cation concentrations are much lower than 1.021 M. In fact, many molecular biology techniques require buffers containing monovalent cation concentrations other than 1.021 M. Predictions based on the 1.021 M Na(+) parameters may not be accurate when the monovalent cation concentration is not 1.021 M. Here, we report thermodynamic data from optical melting experiments for a set of 18 RNA duplexes, each melted over a wide range of sodium ion concentrations (71, 121, 221, and 621 mM). Using these data and previously published data for the same sequences melted in 1.021 M Na(+), we report Tm and ΔG°37 correction factors to scale the standard 1.021 M Na(+) RNA parameters to other sodium ion concentrations. The recommended Tm correction factor predicts the melting temperature within 0.7 °C, and the recommended ΔG°37 correction factor predicts the free energy within 0.14 kcal/mol. These correction factors can be incorporated into prediction algorithms that predict RNA secondary structure from sequence and provide Tm and ΔG°37 values for RNA duplexes.

Indexed as

Base PairingCalorimetry, Differential ScanningNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA StabilitySodiumTemperatureThermodynamicsRNASodium

Identifiers

PMID24106785
PMCPMC3859436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.