ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2013
A large-scale neural network model of the influence of neuromodulatory levels on working memory and behavior.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of the locus coeruleus in eye movements during perceptual decision making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Heightened SAM- and HPA-axis activity during acute stress impairs decision-making: A systematic review on underlying neuropharmacological mechanisms.Neurobiology of stress · 2024Article
- A mechanistic model for individualised treatment of anxiety disorders based on predictive neural biomarkers.Psychological medicine · 2020Review
- Genetically-Driven Enhancement of Dopaminergic Transmission Affects Moral Acceptability in Females but Not in Males: A Pilot Study.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2017Article
- Neuromodulatory Systems and Their Interactions: A Review of Models, Theories, and Experiments.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2017Review
- A heuristic model for working memory deficit in schizophrenia.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2016Article
- Lactate transport and signaling in the brain: potential therapeutic targets and roles in body-brain interaction.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2015Review
- From specificity to sensitivity: affective states modulate visual working memory for emotional expressive faces.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
- Improper activation of D1 and D2 receptors leads to excess noise in prefrontal cortex.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2015Article
- Dopamine modulation of learning and memory in the prefrontal cortex: insights from studies in primates, rodents, and birds.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2014Review
- The role of prefrontal catecholamines in attention and working memory.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2014Review
- A dynamic, embodied paradigm to investigate the role of serotonin in decision-making.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2013Review
- Neuromodulation, Emotional Feelings and Affective Disorders.Mens sana monographsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), which is regarded as the primary site for visuospatial working memory in the brain, is significantly modulated by dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE). DA and NE originate in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and locus coeruleus (LC), respectively, and have been shown to have an "inverted-U" dose-response profile in dlPFC, where the level of arousal and decision-making performance is a function of DA and NE concentrations. Moreover, there appears to be a sweet spot, in terms of the level of DA and NE activation, which allows for optimal working memory and behavioral performance. When either DA or NE is too high, input to the PFC is essentially blocked. When either DA or NE is too low, PFC network dynamics become noisy and activity levels diminish. Mechanisms for how this is occurring have been suggested, however, they have not been tested in a large-scale model with neurobiologically plausible network dynamics. Also, DA and NE levels have not been simultaneously manipulated experimentally, which is not realistic in vivo due to strong bi-directional connections between the VTA and LC. To address these issues, we built a spiking neural network model that includes D1, α2A, and α1 receptors. The model was able to match the inverted-U profiles that have been shown experimentally for differing levels of DA and NE. Furthermore, we were able to make predictions about what working memory and behavioral deficits may occur during simultaneous manipulation of DA and NE outside of their optimal levels. Specifically, when DA levels were low and NE levels were high, cues could not be held in working memory due to increased noise. On the other hand, when DA levels were high and NE levels were low, incorrect decisions were made due to weak overall network activity. We also show that lateral inhibition in working memory may play a more important role in increasing signal-to-noise ratio than increasing recurrent excitatory input.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.