Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24106397›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Probiotics and irritable bowel syndrome.

Cong Dai, Chang-Qing Zheng, Min Jiang, Xiao-Yu Ma, Li-Juan Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Bacillus Subtilis (BG01-4Nutrients · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex Difference in the Effect ofJournal of cancer prevention · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Supplementation with CombinedMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Sex-Gender Differences in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cong DaiCong Dai, Xiao-Yu Ma, Li-Juan Jiang, Department of Cadre Ward V, First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China.
Chang-Qing Zheng
Min Jiang
Xiao-Yu Ma
Li-Juan Jiang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is common gastrointestinal problems. It is characterized by abdominal pain or discomfort, and is associated with changes in stool frequency and/or consistency. The etiopathogenesis of IBS may be multifactorial, as is the pathophysiology, which is attributed to alterations in gastrointestinal motility, visceral hypersensitivity, intestinal microbiota, gut epithelium and immune function, dysfunction of the brain-gut axis or certain psychosocial factors. Current therapeutic strategies are often unsatisfactory. There is now increasing evidence linking alterations in the gastrointestinal microbiota and IBS. Probiotics are living organisms which, when ingested in certain numbers, exert health benefits beyond inherent basic nutrition. Probiotics have numerous positive effects in the gastrointestinal tract. Recently, many studies have suggested that probiotics are effective in the treatment of IBS. The mechanisms of probiotics in IBS are very complex. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence and mechanisms for the use of probiotics in the treatment of IBS.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TherapyFecesHumansIntestinesIrritable Bowel SyndromeProbioticsRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeBrain-gut axisImmune functionIrritable bowel syndromeProbioticsVisceral hypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID24106397
PMCPMC3785618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.