Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24106235›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2014

Participation of very old adults in health care decisions.

Julie P W Bynum, Laura Barre, Catherine Reed, Honor Passow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie P W BynumDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA (JPWB, LB, CR, HP).
Laura BarreDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA (JPWB, LB, CR, HP).
Catherine ReedDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA (JPWB, LB, CR, HP).
Honor PassowDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA (JPWB, LB, CR, HP).

Funding

UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING EPISODE-BASED HOSPITAL CAREP01AG019783 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI NANCY J BIRKMEYER · 2001 to 2026
$52.9M
Improving the Quality of Health Systems for the Very OldK23AG028947 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BYNUM, JULIE PW · 2007 to 2011
$866k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG028947NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019783NIA NIH HHS P01 AG19783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome elderly people receive tests or interventions from which they have low likelihood of benefit or for which the goal is not aligned with their values. Engaging these patients in the decision process is one potential approach to improve the individualization of care. Yet some clinicians perceive and some survey data suggest that older adults prefer not to participate in the decision-making process. Those preferences, however, may be formed based on an experience in which factors, such as communication issues, were barriers to participation. Our goal was to shed light on the experience of very old adults in health care decision making from their own point of view to deepen our understanding of their potentially modifiable barriers to participation.

designand

methodsSemistructured interviews of participants aged 80 and older (n = 29, 59% women and 21% black) were analyzed using the constant comparative method in a grounded theory approach to describe decision making in clinic visits from the patient's perspective.

resultsThe average age was 84 years (range, 80-93); each described an average of 6.4 decision episodes. Active participation was highly variable among subjects. Marked differences in participation across participants and by type of decision--surgery, medications, diagnostic procedures, routine testing for preventive care--highlighted barriers to greater participation. The most common potentially modifiable barriers were the perception that there were no options to consider, low patient activation, and communication issues.

conclusionsThe experience of very old adults highlights potentially modifiable barriers to greater participation in decision making. To bring very old patients into the decision process, clinicians must modify interviewing skills and spend additional time eliciting their values, goals, and preferences.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient ParticipationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleUnited Statesattitudes and perceptionsdecision makingoldest oldphysician-patient communicationqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID24106235
PMCPMC3946215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.