ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2013
Implementation of an alert and response system in Haiti during the early stage of the response to the cholera epidemic.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The practice of evaluating epidemic response in humanitarian and low-income settings: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Diagonal Investments in Health Systems: PEPFAR's Approach to Sustaining the HIV Response and Enhancing Global Health Security.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Conditions for transient epidemics of waterborne disease in spatially explicit systems.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- The case-area targeted rapid response strategy to control cholera in Haiti: a four-year implementation study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Article
- Event-based surveillance at health facility and community level in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMJ global health · 2019Article
- Containment measures for emerging and re-emerging vector-borne and other infectious diseases of poverty in urban settings: a scoping review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2018Article
- Micro-Hotspots of Risk in Urban Cholera Epidemics.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2018Article
- The potential impact of case-area targeted interventions in response to cholera outbreaks: A modeling study.PLoS medicine · 2018Article
- Assessment of Community Event-Based Surveillance for Ebola Virus Disease, Sierra Leone, 2015.Emerging infectious diseases · 2016Article
- Mortality Rates during Cholera Epidemic, Haiti, 2010-2011.Emerging infectious diseases · 2016Article
- New technologies in predicting, preventing and controlling emerging infectious diseases.Virulence · 2015Review
- Cholera elimination in Hispaniola.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The start of the cholera epidemic in Haiti quickly highlighted the necessity of the implementation of an Alert and Response (A&R) System to complement the existing national surveillance system. The national system had been able to detect and confirm the outbreak etiology but required external support to monitor the spread of cholera and coordinate response, because much of the information produced was insufficiently timely for real-time monitoring and directing of a rapid, targeted response. The A&R System was designed by the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization in collaboration with the Haiti Ministry of Health, and it was based on a network of partners, including any institution, structure, or individual that could identify, verify, and respond to alerts. The defined objectives were to (1) save lives through early detection and treatment of cases and (2) control the spread through early intervention at the community level. The operational structure could be broken down into three principle categories: (1) alert (early warning), (2) verification and assessment of the information, and (3) efficient and timely response in coordination with partners to avoid duplication. Information generated by the A&R System was analyzed and interpreted, and the qualitative information was critical in qualifying the epidemic and defining vulnerable areas, particularly because the national surveillance system reported incomplete data for more than one department. The A&R System detected a number of alerts unrelated to cholera and facilitated rapid access to that information. The sensitivity of the system and its ability to react quickly was shown in May of 2011, when an abnormal increase in alerts coming from several communes in the Sud-Est Department in epidemiological weeks (EWs) 17 and 18 were noted and disseminated network-wide and response activities were implemented. The national cholera surveillance system did not register the increase until EWs 21 and 22, and the information did not become available until EWs 23 and 24, when the peak of cases had already been reached. Although many of the partners reporting alerts during the peak of the cholera epidemic have since left Haiti, the A&R System has continued to function as an Early Warning (EWARN) System, and it continues to be developed with recent activities, such as the distribution of cell phones to enhance alert communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.