ArticleGenome research2014
Multiplex mapping of chromatin accessibility and DNA methylation within targeted single molecules identifies epigenetic heterogeneity in neural stem cells and glioblastoma.
Article in Genome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- A practical guide to studying genome function using single-molecule genomics.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026Review
- FENGC: Targeted, Multiplexed, and Integrated Single-Molecule Profiling of Chromatin Accessibility and DNA Methylation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Examining chromatin heterogeneity through PacBio long-read sequencing of M.EcoGII methylated genomes: an m6A detection efficiency and calling bias correcting pipeline.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Single-molecule long-read methylation profiling reveals regional DNA methylation regulated by Elongator Complex Subunit 2 in Arabidopsis roots experiencing spaceflight.Biology direct · 2024Article
- Single molecule MATAC-seq reveals key determinants of DNA replication origin efficiency.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Examining chromatin heterogeneity through PacBio long-read sequencing of M.EcoGII methylated genomes: an mbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Beyond assembly: the increasing flexibility of single-molecule sequencing technology.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Chromatin accessibility: methods, mechanisms, and biological insights.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2022Review
- Cancer cell heterogeneity and plasticity: A paradigm shift in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2022Review
- ImmuMethy, a database of DNA methylation plasticity at a single cytosine resolution in human blood and immune cells.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- Modification mapping by nanopore sequencing.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Genome-wide quantification of transcription factor binding at single-DNA-molecule resolution using methyl-transferase footprinting.Nature protocols · 2021Review
- The dynamic broad epigenetic (H3K4me3, H3K27ac) domain as a mark of essential genes.Clinical epigenetics · 2021Review
- Molecular Co-occupancy Identifies Transcription Factor Binding Cooperativity In Vivo.Molecular cell · 2021Article
- Review
- Article
- Identification of methylation states of DNA regions for Illumina methylation BeadChip.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Long-range single-molecule mapping of chromatin accessibility in eukaryotes.Nature methods · 2020Article
- Glioblastoma stem cells and Wnt signaling pathway: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2020Review
- Accessibility of promoter DNA is not the primary determinant of chromatin-mediated gene regulation.Genome research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Human tumors are comprised of heterogeneous cell populations that display diverse molecular and phenotypic features. To examine the extent to which epigenetic differences contribute to intratumoral cellular heterogeneity, we have developed a high-throughput method, termed MAPit-patch. The method uses multiplexed amplification of targeted sequences from submicrogram quantities of genomic DNA followed by next generation bisulfite sequencing. This provides highly scalable and simultaneous mapping of chromatin accessibility and DNA methylation on single molecules at high resolution. Long sequencing reads from targeted regions maintain the structural integrity of epigenetic information and provide substantial depth of coverage, detecting for the first time minority subpopulations of epigenetic configurations formerly obscured by existing genome-wide and population-ensemble methodologies. Analyzing a cohort of 71 promoters of genes with exons commonly mutated in cancer, MAPit-patch uncovered several differentially accessible and methylated promoters that are associated with altered gene expression between neural stem cell (NSC) and glioblastoma (GBM) cell populations. In addition, considering each promoter individually, substantial epigenetic heterogeneity was observed across the sequenced molecules, indicating the presence of epigenetically distinct cellular subpopulations. At the divergent MLH1/EPM2AIP1 promoter, a locus with three well-defined, nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs), a fraction of promoter copies with inaccessible chromatin was detected and enriched upon selection of temozolomide-tolerant GBM cells. These results illustrate the biological relevance of epigenetically distinct subpopulations that in part underlie the phenotypic heterogeneity of tumor cell populations. Furthermore, these findings show that alterations in chromatin accessibility without accompanying changes in DNA methylation may constitute a novel class of epigenetic biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.