Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24105641›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2013

The challenge of stroke prevention with intracranial arterial stenosis.

Tanya N Turan, Alison Smock, Marc I Chimowitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanya N TuranMUSC Stroke Program, Suite 501, Harborview Office Tower, 19 Hagood Ave, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA, turan@musc.edu.
Alison Smock
Marc I Chimowitz

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
X LINKED NYSTAGMUS SYNDROME WITH FEATURES OF ALBINISMM01RR000039 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI QUYYUMI, ARSHED A · 1985 to 2007
$21.3M
SAMMPRIS (Stenting vs. Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing . . .U01NS058728 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CHIMOWITZ, MARC IVOR · 2008 to 2011
$20.0M
Characterization of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Using HR MRIK23NS069668 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI TURAN, TANYA N · 2011 to 2015
$903k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000039NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS069668NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS058728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease have a high risk of recurrent stroke, and secondary prevention in these patients remains a challenge. Aggressive medical management of vascular risk factors is safe and effective for most high risk patients, but the role of endovascular and surgical therapies still remain uncertain. Future studies may identify novel therapeutic strategies for patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease, but aggressive risk factor control remains the mainstay of evidenced-based treatment at this time.

Indexed as

Secondary PreventionAspirinCarotid Artery, CommonCarotid StenosisClopidogrelConstriction, PathologicDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansIntracranial ArteriosclerosisMalePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRisk FactorsRisk Reduction BehaviorStrokeAspirinClopidogrelFibrinolytic AgentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidineWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID24105641
PMCPMC3870590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.