Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24105275›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2013

Advanced genetic tools for plant biotechnology.

Wusheng Liu, Joshua S Yuan, C Neal Stewart

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Design and Testing of Root-Specific Synthetic Promoters by Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Plant Biotic and Abiotic Stresses.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Transgene Bioconfinement: Don't Flow There.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wusheng LiuDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA.
Joshua S Yuan
C Neal Stewart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basic research has provided a much better understanding of the genetic networks and regulatory hierarchies in plants. To meet the challenges of agriculture, we must be able to rapidly translate this knowledge into generating improved plants. Therefore, in this Review, we discuss advanced tools that are currently available for use in plant biotechnology to produce new products in plants and to generate plants with new functions. These tools include synthetic promoters, 'tunable' transcription factors, genome-editing tools and site-specific recombinases. We also review some tools with the potential to enable crop improvement, such as methods for the assembly and synthesis of large DNA molecules, plant transformation with linked multigenes and plant artificial chromosomes. These genetic technologies should be integrated to realize their potential for applications to pressing agricultural and environmental problems.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyGenome, PlantAgricultureChromosomes, ArtificialCrops, AgriculturalDNA NucleotidyltransferasesGenetic EngineeringGene Transfer TechniquesMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPlantsPlants, Genetically ModifiedPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription FactorsDNA NucleotidyltransferasesSite-specific recombinaseTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24105275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.