Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24105273›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2013

The genetic causes of convergent evolution.

David L Stern

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 414 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
414citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

414 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The genetic foundations of convergent traits.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Adaptation: by giant leaps or many tiny steps?Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. MoleRate: comparing molecular relative evolutionary rates to detect convergent evolution.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Universal Baseline forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article

354 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David L SternJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of phenotypic similarities between species, known as convergence, illustrates that populations can respond predictably to ecological challenges. Convergence often results from similar genetic changes, which can emerge in two ways: the evolution of similar or identical mutations in independent lineages, which is termed parallel evolution; and the evolution in independent lineages of alleles that are shared among populations, which I call collateral genetic evolution. Evidence for parallel and collateral evolution has been found in many taxa, and an emerging hypothesis is that they result from the fact that mutations in some genetic targets minimize pleiotropic effects while simultaneously maximizing adaptation. If this proves correct, then the molecular changes underlying adaptation might be more predictable than has been appreciated previously.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAllelesAnimalsBacteriaButterfliesFishesGene Transfer, HorizontalHumansLinkage DisequilibriumMutationPhenotypeViruses

Identifiers

PMID24105273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.