Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24104962›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013

High-risk features in radiation-associated breast angiosarcomas.

S P D'Angelo, C R Antonescu, D Kuk, L Qin, N Moraco, R C Carvajal, P Chi, M A Dickson, M Gounder, M L Keohan and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recurrent radiogenic angiosarcoma of the breast: a rare case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A rare case of radiation-induced breast angiosarcoma: a case report.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Radiation-induced angiosarcoma: case report.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S P D'Angelo1] Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA [2] Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
C R Antonescu
D Kuk
L Qin
N Moraco
R C Carvajal
P Chi
M A Dickson
M Gounder
M L Keohan
S Singer
G K Schwartz
W D Tap
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE in Soft Tissue SarcomaP50CA140146 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LADANYI, MARC · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (RT-AS) is an uncommon malignancy with an incidence of less than 1 % of all soft tissue sarcomas. The overall prognosis is quite dismal with high rates of recurrences and poor overall survival. There is an obvious paucity of data regarding clinical outcomes of patients with breast RT-AS.

methodsWe identified all patients with RT-AS treated at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1982-2011 and collected their correlative clinical information.

resultsWe identified 79 women with RT-AS with a median age of 68 (range 36-87). The median interval between radiation and development of RT-AS was 7 years (range 3-19). The median time to local and distant recurrence was 1.29 years (95 % CI 0.72-NA) and 2.48 years (95 % CI 1.29-NA), respectively. The median disease-specific survival was 2.97 years (95 % CI 2.21-NA). Independent predictors of worse disease-specific survival included age 68 years (HR 3.11, 95 % CI 1.20-8.08, P=0.020) and deep tumors (HR 3.23, 95 % CI 1.02-10.21, P=0.046.)

conclusionRT-AS has high local/distant recurrence rates, limited duration on standard chemotherapy and poor disease-specific survival.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHemangiosarcomaHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPrognosisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24104962
PMCPMC3817330
OpenAlexW1975065479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.