Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24104945›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia2014

Kidney function after the intraoperative use of 6% tetrastarches (HES 130/0.4 and 0.42).

Hironori Ishihara

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hironori IshiharaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kuroishi-Kosei Hospital, 9-1 Tateishi, Kuroishi, Aomori, 036-0351, Japan, concerto0328@yahoo.co.jp.
Sapporo Kosei General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns about the nephrotoxicity of tetrastarches have recently increased with the accumulation of new evidence, particularly in relationship to septic patients. Two meta-analyses in 2011 and early 2012 also raised concerns about nephrotoxicity in surgical patients and prompted the present review of the nephrotoxicity of tetrastarches solely in the surgical setting. Seven reports consisting of two review articles and five single-trial papers published between 2012 and August 2013 were examined. Six of the seven studies did not show any adverse renal outcomes following the intraoperative use of tetrastarch, although their data are not robust enough to confirm definitive safety. Moreover, balanced electrolyte solutions are strongly recommended as a carrier solution for tetrastarches to reduce adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultClinical Trials as TopicElectrolytesHumansHydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesIntraoperative PeriodKidneyKidney Function TestsPlasma SubstitutesElectrolytesHES 130-0.4Hydroxyethyl Starch DerivativesPlasma Substitutes

Identifiers

PMID24104945
OpenAlexW2002846654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.