Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24103152›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2013

The clinical measurement, measurement method and experimental condition ontologies: expansion, improvements and new applications.

Jennifer R Smith, Carissa A Park, Rajni Nigam, Stanley Jf Laulederkind, G Thomas Hayman, Shur-Jen Wang, Timothy F Lowry, Victoria Petri, Jeff De Pons, Marek Tutaj and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Establishing the hybrid rat diversity program: a resource for dissecting complex traits.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The Ontology of Biological Attributes (OBA)-computational traits for the life sciences.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Quantitative phenotype analysis to identify, validate and compare rat disease models.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  17. Integrated curation and data mining for disease and phenotype models at the Rat Genome Database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  18. Ensembl variation resources.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jennifer R SmithHuman and Molecular Genetics Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. shimoyama@mcw.edu.
Carissa A Park
Rajni Nigam
Stanley Jf Laulederkind
G Thomas Hayman
Shur-Jen Wang
Timothy F Lowry
Victoria Petri
Jeff De Pons
Marek Tutaj
Weisong Liu
Elizabeth A Worthey
Mary Shimoyama
Melinda R Dwinell

Funding

RAT GENOME DATABASER01HL064541 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI ANNE E. KWITEK · 1999 to 2026
$50.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL064541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Clinical Measurement Ontology (CMO), Measurement Method Ontology (MMO), and Experimental Condition Ontology (XCO) were originally developed at the Rat Genome Database (RGD) to standardize quantitative rat phenotype data in order to integrate results from multiple studies into the PhenoMiner database and data mining tool. These ontologies provide the framework for presenting what was measured, how it was measured, and under what conditions it was measured.

resultsThere has been a continuing expansion of subdomains in each ontology with a parallel 2-3 fold increase in the total number of terms, substantially increasing the size and improving the scope of the ontologies. The proportion of terms with textual definitions has increased from ~60% to over 80% with greater synchronization of format and content throughout the three ontologies. Representation of definition source Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI) has been standardized, including the removal of all non-URI characters, and systematic versioning of all ontology files has been implemented. The continued expansion and success of these ontologies has facilitated the integration of more than 60,000 records into the RGD PhenoMiner database. In addition, new applications of these ontologies, such as annotation of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL), have been added at the sites actively using them, including RGD and the Animal QTL Database.

conclusionsThe improvements to these three ontologies have been substantial, and development is ongoing. New terms and expansions to the ontologies continue to be added as a result of active curation efforts at RGD and the Animal QTL database. Use of these vocabularies to standardize data representation for quantitative phenotypes and quantitative trait loci across databases for multiple species has demonstrated their utility for integrating diverse data types from multiple sources. These ontologies are freely available for download and use from the NCBO BioPortal website at http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/1583 (CMO), http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/1584 (MMO), and http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/1585 (XCO), or from the RGD ftp site at ftp://rgd.mcw.edu/pub/ontology/.

Identifiers

PMID24103152
PMCPMC3882879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.