Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24103060›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2014

Did hardening occur among smokers in England from 2000 to 2010?

Graeme Docherty, Ann McNeill, Coral Gartner, Lisa Szatkowski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Trends in Attempts to Quit Smoking in England Since 2007: A Time Series Analysis of a Range of Population-Level Influences.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The epidemiology of lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Update on medicines for smoking cessation.Australian prescriber · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Using your bullets most wisely for the smoking gun.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Graeme DochertyDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ann McNeill
Coral Gartner
Lisa Szatkowski
UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess trends in the prevalence of 'hardcore' smoking in England between 2000 and 2010, and to examine associations between hardcore smoking and socio-demographic variables.

designSecondary analysis of data from the United Kingdom's General Lifestyle Survey (GLF) and the Health Survey for England (HSE).

settingHouseholds in England.

participantsSelf-reported adult current smokers resident in England aged 26 years and over. MEASUREMENTS: Hardcore smokers were defined in three ways: smokers who do not want to quit (D1), those who 'usually' smoke their first cigarette of the day within 30 minutes of waking (D2) and a combination of D1 and D2, termed D3. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore associations between these variables and calendar year, age, sex and socio-economic status, and P-values for trends in odds were calculated.

findingsThe odds of smokers being defined as hardcore according to D3 increased over time in both the GLF (P < 0.001) and HSE (P = 0.04), even after adjusting for risk factors. Higher dependence (D2) was noted in men [odds ratio (OR): 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.24], those of 50-59 years (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.80-2.09) and smokers in lower occupational groups (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: (1.97-2.26). Lack of motivation to quit (D1) increased with age and was more likely in men.

conclusionsThe proportion of smokers in England with both low motivation to quit and high dependence appears to have increased between 2000 and 2010, independently of risk factors, suggesting that 'hardening' may be occurring in this smoker population.

Indexed as

AttitudeAdultEnglandFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrevalenceSmokingSmoking CessationTobacco Use DisorderCessationdependencehardcorehardeninginequalitiespopulation

Identifiers

PMID24103060
PMCPMC3933730
OpenAlexW1543256914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.