Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24102956›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2013

Whole-genome sequencing of two North American Drosophila melanogaster populations reveals genetic differentiation and positive selection.

D Campo, K Lehmann, C Fjeldsted, T Souaiaia, J Kao, S V Nuzhdin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TheG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Population Genomics on the Fly: Recent Advances in Drosophila.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Phylogeny of the GenusGenetics · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Conservation of social effects (ΨEcology and evolution · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D CampoMolecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
K Lehmann
C Fjeldsted
T Souaiaia
J Kao
S V Nuzhdin
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Implications of haplotype structure in the human genomeP50HG002790 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TAVARE, SIMON · 2003 to 2013
$29.9M
Population Genetic Framework for Neuroanatomical Mechanisms of Behavioral ModificR01MH091561 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
Nucleotide polymorphisms responsible for expression variation in DrosophilaR01GM076643 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2006 to 2009
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG002790NIGMS NIH HHS GM076643NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076643NIMH NIH HHS MH091561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevailing demographic model for Drosophila melanogaster suggests that the colonization of North America occurred very recently from a subset of European flies that rapidly expanded across the continent. This model implies a sudden population growth and range expansion consistent with very low or no population subdivision. As flies adapt to new environments, local adaptation events may be expected. To describe demographic and selective events during North American colonization, we have generated a data set of 35 individual whole-genome sequences from inbred lines of D. melanogaster from a west coast US population (Winters, California, USA) and compared them with a public genome data set from Raleigh (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA). We analysed nuclear and mitochondrial genomes and described levels of variation and divergence within and between these two North American D. melanogaster populations. Both populations exhibit negative values of Tajima's D across the genome, a common signature of demographic expansion. We also detected a low but significant level of genome-wide differentiation between the two populations, as well as multiple allele surfing events, which can be the result of gene drift in local subpopulations on the edge of an expansion wave. In contrast to this genome-wide pattern, we uncovered a 50-kilobase segment in chromosome arm 3L that showed all the hallmarks of a soft selective sweep in both populations. A comparison of allele frequencies within this divergent region among six populations from three continents allowed us to cluster these populations in two differentiated groups, providing evidence for the action of natural selection on a global scale.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectSelection, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsCaliforniaCell NucleusDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenome, MitochondrialGenotypeMolecular Sequence DataNorth Carolinademographic expansionglobal patternpopulation differentiationpositive selectionsoft selective sweepwhole genome

Identifiers

PMID24102956
PMCPMC3800041
OpenAlexW2144166566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.