ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015
Can research development bursaries for patient and public involvement have a positive impact on grant applications? A UK-based, small-scale service evaluation.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compensating patient partners on health research teams: a qualitative descriptive study of barriers, facilitators, and implications for equity, diversity, and inclusion in Canadian patient-oriented research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Involving people with a lived experience when developing a proposal for Health Technology Assessment research of nonsurgical treatments for pelvic organ prolapse: Process and reflections.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- What Matters to Whom: Patient and Public Involvement in Research.Clinical obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Article
- Patient and Public Involvement in Sexual and Reproductive Health: Time to Properly Integrate Citizen's Input into Science.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Supported and valued? A survey of early career researchers' experiences and perceptions of youth and adult involvement in mental health, self-harm and suicide research.Research involvement and engagement · 2019Article
- Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands: creating, delivering and evaluating the lay assessor training programme.Research involvement and engagement · 2017Article
- A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards.Research involvement and engagement · 2017Article
- Evaluating public involvement in research design and grant development: Using a qualitative document analysis method to analyse an award scheme for researchers.Research involvement and engagement · 2016Article
- Article
- Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trial development: a systematic cohort investigation.BMJ open · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreasingly, research grant awarding bodies are regarding involvement at all stages of research, including prior to funding, as good practice. However, it is unclear how researchers should pay for this. Therefore, a pre-funding bursary scheme was designed. Up to £500 could be requested for involvement to develop a grant application for which user involvement is a key requisite for the funding body concerned. As the bursary scheme had run for 2 years, an evaluation was conducted to ascertain whether the scheme was effective for incorporating early involvement and in developing the grant proposal.
resultsTwelve applications were made of which all were funded. The mean amount requested was £432.91; with the mean amount awarded £308.72. The involvement activities conducted all used qualitative methodology. Feedback regarding the bursaries was positive: enabling refinement of the research question and design; developing dialogue between the service users and the researchers; and helping with team building, with service users sometimes becoming co-applicants or members of the steering groups. The bursaries provided a learning opportunity – about involvement for the researchers and about research for the service users. The ultimate aim of the scheme was to enhance the research grant. Regarding this, the involvement paid for by the bursary meant that applicants could complete the involvement sections with in-depth information and clarity.
conclusionFor a relatively small financial outlay, appropriate involvement was made possible at an important part of the research process which is usually neglected due to lack of funding. Recommendations for implementation made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.