Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24102851›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2013

Simultaneous compared with sequential blood pressure measurement results in smaller inter-arm blood pressure differences.

Niels V van der Hoeven, Sophie Lodestijn, Stephanie Nanninga, Gert A van Montfrans, Bert-Jan H van den Born

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences in blood pressure for different primary care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Inter-Arm Blood Pressure Differences May Be Important for Predicting Mortality.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2016
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Inter-arm blood pressure difference in hospitalized elderly patients--is it consistent?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2014
    Article
  18. Inter-arm blood pressure differences in aviators: is it important?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2014
    Article
  19. Inter-arm blood pressure difference.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Niels V van der HoevenDepartments of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sophie Lodestijn
Stephanie Nanninga
Gert A van Montfrans
Bert-Jan H van den Born

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are currently few recommendations on how to assess inter-arm blood pressure (BP) differences. The authors compared simultaneous with sequential measurement on mean BP, inter-arm BP differences, and within-visit reproducibility in 240 patients stratified according to age (<50 or ≥60 years) and BP (<140/90 mm Hg or ≥140/90 mm Hg). Three simultaneous and three sequential BP measurements were taken in each patient. Starting measurement type and starting arm for sequential measurements were randomized. Mean BP and inter-arm BP differences of the first pair and reproducibility of inter-arm BP differences of the first and second pair were compared between both methods. Mean systolic BP was 1.3±7.5 mm Hg lower during sequential compared with simultaneous measurement (P<.01). However, the first sequential measurement was on average higher than the second, suggesting an order effect. Absolute systolic inter-arm BP differences were smaller on simultaneous (6.2±6.7/3.3±3.5 mm Hg) compared with sequential BP measurement (7.8±7.3/4.6±5.6 mm Hg, P<.01 for both). Within-visit reproducibility was identical (both r=0.60). Simultaneous measurement of BP at both arms reduces order effects and results in smaller inter-arm BP differences, thereby potentially reducing unnecessary referral and diagnostic procedures.

Indexed as

Office VisitsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArmBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24102851
PMCPMC8033923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.