Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24102638›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2013

Fabrication of nitric oxide-releasing porous polyurethane membranes-coated needle-type implantable glucose biosensors.

Ahyeon Koh, Yuan Lu, Mark H Schoenfisch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. S-Nitroso-Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Dexamethasone-Enhanced Microdialysis and Penetration Injury.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Prevascularized silicon membranes for the enhancement of transport to implanted medical devices.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahyeon KohDepartment of Chemistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.
Yuan Lu
Mark H Schoenfisch

Funding

Nitric Oxide-Releasing Glucose BiosensorsR01EB000708 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SCHOENFISCH, MARK H · 2002 to 2011
$3.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB000708NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The active release of pharmaceutical agents and the use of porous sensor membranes represent the two most promising strategies for addressing the poor tissue biocompatibility of implantable glucose biosensors. Herein, we describe the combination of these approaches to create nitric oxide (NO)-releasing porous fiber mat-modified sensor membranes. An electrospinning method was used to directly modify needle-type glucose biosensors with the NO donor-loaded fibers. The resulting NO-releasing fiber mat (540 ± 139 nm fiber diameter, 94.1 ± 3.7% porosity) released ~100 nmol of NO per mg of polyurethane over 6 h while maintaining a porous structure without leaching of the NO donor, even in serum. The porous fiber membrane did not influence the analytical performance of the biosensor when ≤50 μm thick.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesMembranes, ArtificialGlucoseMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNitric OxidePolyurethanesGlucoseMembranes, ArtificialNitric OxidePolyurethanes

Identifiers

PMID24102638
PMCPMC3889667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.