Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24102408›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2014

Has Medicare Part D reduced racial/ethnic disparities in prescription drug use and spending?

Elham Mahmoudi, Gail A Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of regulating drug insurance schemes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Effects of Part D Senior Savings Model on healthcare costs among the Medicare population.Journal of pharmaceutical health services research : an official journal of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How Did Medicare Part D Affect Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Drug Coverage?The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2016
    Article
  16. Impact of Medicare Part D on Racial and Ethnic Minorities.Diversity and equality in health and care · 2016
    Article
  17. A Review of the Use of Medicare Claims Data in Plastic Surgery Outcomes Research.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elham MahmoudiDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Gail A Jensen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether Medicare Part D has reduced racial/ethnic disparities in prescription drug utilization and spending. DATA: Nationally representative data on white, African American, and Hispanic Medicare seniors from the 2002-2009 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey are analyzed. Five measures are examined: filling any prescriptions during the year, the number of prescriptions filled, total annual prescription spending, annual out-of-pocket prescription spending, and average copay level. STUDY

designWe apply the Institute of Medicine's definition of a racial/ethnic disparity and adopt a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) estimator using a multivariate regression framework. The treatment group consists of Medicare seniors, the comparison group, adults without Medicare aged 55-63 years. PRINCIPAL

findingsDifference-in-difference-in-differences estimates suggest that for African Americans Part D increased the disparity in annual spending on prescription drugs by $258 (p=.011), yet had no effect on other measures of prescription drug disparities. For Hispanics, DDD estimates suggest that the program reduced the disparities in annual number of prescriptions filled, annual total and out-of-pocket spending on prescription drugs by 2.9 (p=.077), $282 (p=.019) and $143 (p<.001), respectively.

conclusionMedicare Part D had mixed effects. Although it reduced Hispanic/white disparities related to prescription drugs among seniors, it increased the African American/white disparity in total annual spending on prescription drugs.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanDrug UtilizationFemaleFinancing, PersonalHealthcare DisparitiesHealth StatusHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMedicare Part DMiddle AgedPrescription DrugsRacial GroupsSex FactorsPrescription DrugsMedicare Part Dprescription drugsracial/ethnic disparitiesutilization and spending

Identifiers

PMID24102408
PMCPMC3976184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.