Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24101877›Full record

ArticlePharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2013

Delivering pharmacogenetic testing in a primary care setting.

Rachel Mills, Deepak Voora, Bruce Peyser, Susanne B Haga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Integrating pharmacogenetic testing into primary care.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. A Use Case to Support Precision Medicine for Frequently Hospitalized Older Adults with Polypharmacy.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel MillsDuke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Durham, NC, USA.
Deepak Voora
Bruce Peyser
Susanne B Haga

Funding

Pharmacogenetic Testing: Challenges of Clinical IntegrationR01GM081416 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAGA, SUSANNE · 2008 to 2018
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenetic testing refers to a type of genetic test to predict a patient's likelihood to experience an adverse event or not respond to a given drug. Despite revision to several labels of commonly prescribed drugs regarding the impact of genetic variation, the use of this testing has been limited in many settings due to a number of factors. In the primary care setting, the limited office time as well as the limited knowledge and experience of primary care practitioners have likely attributed to the slow uptake of pharmacogenetic testing. This paper provides talking points for primary care physicians to discuss with patients when pharmacogenetic testing is warranted. As patients and physicians become more familiar and accepting of pharmacogenetic testing, it is anticipated that discussion time will be comparable to that of other clinical tests.

Indexed as

patient educationpharmacogeneticspharmacogenetic testingprimary care

Identifiers

PMID24101877
PMCPMC3791676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.