Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24101861›Full record

SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2013

Efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of bupropion for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials comparison with venlafaxine.

Narong Maneeton, Benchalak Maneeton, Kanokkwan Eurviriyanukul, Manit Srisurapanont

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Narong ManeetonDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Benchalak Maneeton
Kanokkwan Eurviriyanukul
Manit Srisurapanont
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBupropion and venlafaxine are effective antidepressants with unique pharmacological profiles.

objectivesThe purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of bupropion and venlafaxine therapies for adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). The authors searched clinical trials with low risk of bias, performed from January 1985 to February 2013. DATA SOURCES: The searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were conducted in February 2013. Included populations consisted of adult patients with MDD or major depression. Study eligible criteria participants and interventions: included studies were randomized controlled trials (rcts) comparing bupropion and venlafaxine in adult patients with MDD AND OFFERING ENDPOINT RESULTS RELEVANT TO: (1) severity of depression; (2) response rate; (3) remission rate; (4) overall discontinuation rate; or (5) discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Limitation of language was not utilized. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsThe abstracts located from the electronic databases were reviewed. The completed reports from pertinent studies were examined, and essential data were extracted. Based on the Cochrane's bias assessment, risks of bias were assessed. Any study with two risks or more was excluded. Efficacious outcomes included the mean changed scores of rating scales for depression, overall response rates, and overall remission rates. Acceptability was determined by the overall discontinuation rates. The discontinuation rates due to adverse events were the measurement of tolerability. Relative risks (RR) and weighted mean differences or standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using a random effect model.

resultsA total of 1,117 participants in three RCTs were included. Depression rating scales used in one and two studies were the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, respectively. The pooled mean changed scores of the bupropion-treated group were comparable to those of the venlafaxine-treated group with standardized mean differences (95% CI) of 0.05 (-0.16 to 0.26). The overall response and remission rates were similar with the RRs (95% CI) of 0.92 (0.79-1.08) and 0.97 (0.75-1.24), respectively. The pooled overall discontinuation rate and discontinuation rate due to adverse events were not different between groups with the RRs (95% CI) of 1.00 (0.80-1.26) and 0.69 (0.44-1.10), respectively. LIMITATIONS: The small number of RCTs included in the meta-analysis.

conclusionAccording to the limited data obtained from three RCTs, bupropion XL is as effective and tolerable as venlafaxine XR for adult patients with MDD. Further studies in this area should be conducted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationBupropionCyclohexanolsHumansMajor Depressive DisorderPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeVenlafaxine HydrochlorideAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationBupropionCyclohexanolsVenlafaxine Hydrochlorideacceptabilitybupropionmajor depressive disorderresponse ratetolerabilityvenlafaxine

Identifiers

PMID24101861
PMCPMC3790834
OpenAlexW1994320961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.