Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24101627›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

Hand before foot? Cortical somatotopy suggests manual dexterity is primitive and evolved independently of bipedalism.

Teruo Hashimoto, Kenichi Ueno, Akitoshi Ogawa, Takeshi Asamizuya, Chisato Suzuki, Kang Cheng, Michio Tanaka, Miki Taoka, Yoshiaki Iwamura, Gen Suwa and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transfer of Tactile Learning from Trained to Untrained Body Parts Supported by Cortical Coactivation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Design Creativity.Journal of experimental neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  8. Tool use as adaptation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teruo HashimotoLaboratory for Symbolic Cognitive Development, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, , 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Kenichi Ueno
Akitoshi Ogawa
Takeshi Asamizuya
Chisato Suzuki
Kang Cheng
Michio Tanaka
Miki Taoka
Yoshiaki Iwamura
Gen Suwa
Atsushi Iriki
RIKEN Center for Brain Science · JPToho University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People have long speculated whether the evolution of bipedalism in early hominins triggered tool use (by freeing their hands) or whether the necessity of making and using tools encouraged the shift to upright gait. Either way, it is commonly thought that one led to the other. In this study, we sought to shed new light on the origins of manual dexterity and bipedalism by mapping the neural representations in the brain of the fingers and toes of living people and monkeys. Contrary to the 'hand-in-glove' notion outlined above, our results suggest that adaptations underlying tool use evolved independently of those required for human bipedality. In both humans and monkeys, we found that each finger was represented separately in the primary sensorimotor cortex just as they are physically separated in the hand. This reflects the ability to use each digit independently, as required for the complex manipulation involved in tool use. The neural mapping of the subjects' toes differed, however. In the monkeys, the somatotopic representation of the toes was fused, showing that the digits function predominantly as a unit in general grasping. Humans, by contrast, had an independent neurological representation of the big toe (hallux), suggesting association with bipedal locomotion. These observations suggest that the brain circuits for the hand had advanced beyond simple grasping, whereas our primate ancestors were still general arboreal quadrupeds. This early adaptation laid the foundation for the evolution of manual dexterity, which was preserved and enhanced in hominins. In hominins, a separate adaptation, involving the neural separation of the big toe, apparently occurred with bipedality. This accords with the known fossil evidence, including the recently reported hominin fossils which have been dated to 4.4 million years ago.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsElectrophysiologyFemaleFootHandHominidaeHumansMacacaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuronsSomatosensory Cortexelectrophysiologyfingersneuroimagingsomatotopic representationtoes

Identifiers

PMID24101627
PMCPMC4027408
OpenAlexW2150881307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.