Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24101619›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

Tool use as adaptation.

Dora Biro, Michael Haslam, Christian Rutz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Tool use aids prey-fishing in a specialist predator of stingless bees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Modeling a primate technological niche.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Animal cognition in an urbanised world.Frontiers in ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tool-using puffins prickle the puzzle of cognitive evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Evidence of tool use in a seabird.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dora BiroDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, , Oxford, UK.
Michael Haslam
Christian Rutz

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G023913/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G023913/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tool use is a vital component of the human behavioural repertoire. The benefits of tool use have often been assumed to be self-evident: by extending control over our environment, we have increased energetic returns and buffered ourselves from potentially harmful influences. In recent decades, however, the study of tool use in both humans and non-human animals has expanded the way we think about the role of tools in the natural world. This Theme Issue is aimed at bringing together this developing body of knowledge, gathered across multiple species and from multiple research perspectives, to chart the wider evolutionary context of this phylogenetically rare behaviour.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalEnvironmentTool Use BehaviorAnimalsHumansanatomycognitioncultureontogenysocial learningtechnological evolution

Identifiers

PMID24101619
PMCPMC4027410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.