Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24101475›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Structures of the flax-rust effector AvrM reveal insights into the molecular basis of plant-cell entry and effector-triggered immunity.

Thomas Ve, Simon J Williams, Ann-Maree Catanzariti, Maryam Rafiqi, Motiur Rahman, Jeffrey G Ellis, Adrienne R Hardham, David A Jones, Peter A Anderson, Peter N Dodds and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond Resistance Genes: Silencing Susceptibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Effector Pt9226 fromMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Fungal Effectoromics: A World in Constant Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Advances in Fungal Elicitor-Triggered Plant Immunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. UhAVR1, an HR-Triggering Avirulence Effector ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Candidate Effectors FromFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Effectors of Filamentous Plant Pathogens: Commonalities amid Diversity.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas VeSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre and Institute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Simon J Williams
Ann-Maree Catanzariti
Maryam Rafiqi
Motiur Rahman
Jeffrey G Ellis
Adrienne R Hardham
David A Jones
Peter A Anderson
Peter N Dodds
Bostjan Kobe
Australian National University · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUFlinders University · AUUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal and oomycete pathogens cause some of the most devastating diseases in crop plants, and facilitate infection by delivering a large number of effector molecules into the plant cell. AvrM is a secreted effector protein from flax rust (Melampsora lini) that can internalize into plant cells in the absence of the pathogen, binds to phosphoinositides (PIPs), and is recognized directly by the resistance protein M in flax (Linum usitatissimum), resulting in effector-triggered immunity. We determined the crystal structures of two naturally occurring variants of AvrM, AvrM-A and avrM, and both reveal an L-shaped fold consisting of a tandem duplicated four-helix motif, which displays similarity to the WY domain core in oomycete effectors. In the crystals, both AvrM variants form a dimer with an unusual nonglobular shape. Our functional analysis of AvrM reveals that a hydrophobic surface patch conserved between both variants is required for internalization into plant cells, whereas the C-terminal coiled-coil domain mediates interaction with M. AvrM binding to PIPs is dependent on positive surface charges, and mutations that abrogate PIP binding have no significant effect on internalization, suggesting that AvrM binding to PIPs is not essential for transport of AvrM across the plant membrane. The structure of AvrM and the identification of functionally important surface regions advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying how effectors enter plant cells and how they are detected by the plant immune system.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBasidiomycotaCrystallography, X-RayFlaxFungal ProteinsHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunoblottingMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutationNicotianaPhosphatidylinositolsPlant CellsPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesFungal ProteinsPhosphatidylinositolsavirulence proteininnate immunitylipid bindingplant cell internalizationplant disease resistance

Identifiers

PMID24101475
PMCPMC3808616
OpenAlexW2146187800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.