Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24101450›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2014

Defining high risk: cost-effectiveness of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis following major oncologic abdominal surgery.

James C Iannuzzi, Aaron S Rickles, Kristin N Kelly, Fergal J Fleming, James G Dolan, John R T Monson, Katia Noyes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cost-Effectiveness of Aspirin for Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Major Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and validation of a risk calculator for post-discharge venous thromboembolism following hepatectomy for malignancy.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Justifying Total Costs of Extended Venothromboembolism Prophylaxis After Colorectal Cancer Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James C IannuzziSurgical Health Outcomes & Research Enterprise, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box SURG, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA, james_iannuzzi@URMC.rochester.edu.
Aaron S Rickles
Kristin N Kelly
Fergal J Fleming
James G Dolan
John R T Monson
Katia Noyes

Funding

Multi-criteria Clinical Decision Support: A Comparative EvaluationK24HL093488 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DOLAN, JAMES G · 2009 to 2013
$858k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL093488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExtended-duration thromboprophylaxis (EDTPPX) is the practice of prescribing antithrombotic therapy for 21 days after discharge, commonly used in surgical patients who are at high risk for venothromboembolism (VTE). While guidelines recommend EDTPPX, criteria are vague due to a paucity of data. The criteria can be further informed by cost-effectiveness thresholds. This study sought to determine the VTE incidence threshold for the cost-effectiveness of EDTPPX compared to inpatient prophylaxis.

methodsA decision tree was used to compare EDTPPX for 21 days after discharge to 7 days of inpatient prophylaxis with base case assumptions based on an abdominal oncologic resection without complications in an otherwise healthy individual. Willingness to pay was set at $50,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty within the model, with particular interest in the threshold for cost-effectiveness based on VTE incidence.

resultsEDTPPX was the dominant strategy when VTE probability exceeds 2.39 %. Given a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000/QALY, EDTPPX was the preferred strategy when VTE incidence exceeded 1.22 and 0.88 % when using brand name or generic medication costs, respectively.

conclusionsEDTPPX should be recommended whenever VTE incidence exceeds 2.39 %. When post-discharge estimated VTE risk is 0.88-2.39 %, patient preferences about self-injections and medication costs should be considered.

Indexed as

AbdomenCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision TreesDrugs, GenericFibrinolytic AgentsHumansNeoplasmsPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRisk AssessmentVenous ThromboembolismDrugs, GenericFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24101450
PMCPMC4652588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.