Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24101199›Full record

SynthesisOncology reports2013

New molecular staging with G-factors (VEGF-C and Reg IV) by supplementing TNM classification in colorectal cancers.

Tetsuji Sawada, Masakazu Yashiro, Kazuhiro Sentani, Naohide Oue, Wataru Yasui, Kohji Miyazaki, Keita Kai, Hideto Fujita, Keishi Nakamura, Kiyoshi Maeda and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Prognostic Implications of Novel Gene Signatures in Gastric Cancer Microenvironment.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Tetsuji SawadaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masakazu Yashiro
Kazuhiro Sentani
Naohide Oue
Wataru Yasui
Kohji Miyazaki
Keita Kai
Hideto Fujita
Keishi Nakamura
Kiyoshi Maeda
Yoshihiro Kakeji
Shoji Natsugoe
Ken Shirabe
Sachiyo Nomura
Yutaka Shimada
Naohiro Tomita
Kosei Hirakawa
Yoshihiko Maehara
Osaka City University · JPHiroshima University · JPKanazawa University · JPKyushu University · JPSaga University · JPHyogo Medical University · JPKagoshima University · JPKobe University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staging classification of colorectal cancers is performed by the UICC/TNM classification system, which is the global gold standard. However, we often experience in clinical practice that there are considerable differences in prognoses between patients who have the same classification particularly in stage II and III cancers. The aim of this study was to propose a new TNM-G classification to predict prognosis and recurrence by supplementing the conventional TNM classification. A total of 220 cases of colorectal cancer, including 77 at stage II and 143 at stage III, were registered from four independent facilities. Immunohistochemical staining for 7 molecules, such as p53, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF-C, regenerating islet-derived family, member 4 (Reg IV), olfactomedin 4, Claudin-18 and matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP‑7), was performed to investigate the correlation between clinicopathological factors and expression of each molecule. Based on the results, no significant correlation was observed between the immunostaining expression of these 7 factors and recurrence in total colorectal cancer. Recurrence in stage II (77 cases) was significantly higher in cases positive for Reg IV expression (P=0.042). On analysis of overall survival (OS) and disease‑free survival (DFS), VEGF-C and Reg IV expression had a correlation with poor prognosis, therefore, these factors were selected and applied to G-factor classifications so that cases negative for both could be classified as G0, cases positive for either of the factors could be classified as G1, and cases positive for both factors could be classified as G2. While no significant correlation was observed in the recurrence rates between G0 and G2, OS and DFS in stage II cases were significantly poorer for G2 cases in comparison with G0 or G1 cases. The survival curves of OS and DFS in stage II G2 were similar to that of stage III cases. According to these results, prognosis of VEGF-C/Reg IV both positive G2 cases in stage II colorectal cancer was found to be almost equal to the poor survival in stage III cases, and the advancement of one stage up migration based on G-factors may be supposed to be highly feasible for clinical application. In conclusion, the combination of VEGF-C and Reg IV may be a promising factor for clinical staging to supplement the classical TNM classification system, and it may suggest a good indication of adjuvant chemotherapy for G2 cases in stage II colorectal cancers.

Indexed as

ClaudinsColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansLectins, C-TypeMatrix Metalloproteinase 7Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPancreatitis-Associated ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor CClaudinsCLDN18 protein, humanGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorLectins, C-TypeMatrix Metalloproteinase 7MMP7 protein, humanOLFM4 protein, humanPancreatitis-Associated ProteinsREG4 protein, humanVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor C

Identifiers

PMID24101199
PMCPMC3839952
OpenAlexW2152099986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.