Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24101157›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2014

Synergistic interaction between caloric restriction and amphetamine in food-unrelated approach behavior of rats.

Kristine L Keller, Fiori R Vollrath-Smith, Mehrnoosh Jafari, Satoshi Ikemoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Similar roles of substantia nigra and ventral tegmental dopamine neurons in reward and aversion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristine L KellerBehavioral Neuroscience Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 251 Bayview Blvd., Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Fiori R Vollrath-Smith
Mehrnoosh Jafari
Satoshi Ikemoto
National Institute on Drug Abuse · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Optogenetic investigations of motivational circuits in rats and miceZIADA000575 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI IKEMOTO, SATOSHI · 2011 to 2020
$4.8M
Intracranial Drug Self-administrationZIADA000439 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI IKEMOTO, SATOSHI · 2009 to 2013
$2.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleApproach behavior is regulated by the brain integrating information about environment and body state. Psychoactive drugs interact with this process.

objectivesWe examined the extent to which caloric (i.e., food) restriction, amphetamine (AMPH) and lithium interact in potentiating locomotor activity and responding reinforced by visual stimulus (VS), a reward unrelated to energy homeostasis.

methodsRats either had ad libitum access to food or received daily rations that maintained 85-90 % of their original body weights. Leverpressing turned on a cue light for 1 s and turned off house light for 5 s. AMPH and lithium were administered through intraperitoneal injections and diet, respectively.

resultsFood restriction or AMPH (1 mg/kg) alone had little effect on VS-reinforced responding; however, the combination of the two conditions markedly potentiated VS-reinforced responding (fourfold). Food restriction lasting 7 days or longer was needed to augment AMPH's effect on VS-reinforced responding. AMPH (0.3-3 mg/kg) potentiated locomotor activity similarly between food-restricted and ad libitum groups. Repeated injections of AMPH-sensitized locomotor activity, but not VS-reinforced responding. In addition, while chronic lithium treatments (0.2 % lithium carbonate chow) reduced VS-reinforced responding, chronic lithium further augmented AMPH-potentiated VS-reinforced responding.

conclusionsFood restriction interacts with psychoactive drugs to potentiate goal-directed responding unrelated to food seeking in a much more powerful manner than previously thought. The novel finding that lithium can augment a psychostimulant effect of AMPH suggests caution when combining lithium and psychostimulant drugs in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionAmphetamineAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrug SynergismLithium CarbonateMaleMotor ActivityRatsRats, WistarAmphetamineLithium Carbonate

Identifiers

PMID24101157
PMCPMC3945411
OpenAlexW2005969779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.