ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2013
A comparison on expression of selected biomarkers between primary lung cancers and matched metastases.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many biomarkers have been identified to be new targeted drugs for lung cancer treatment. Their clinical outcomes are determined by their status mainly evaluated from primary cancer tissues. However, metastasis is the leading cause of death in cancer patients. It is unclear whether their status in primary cancers is similar to that in corresponding metastases. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate similarities or differences for the selected biomarker expression between primary lung cancers and matched metastases and to provide evidence for further using these targets in metastatic tumors from lung cancer. Eleven patients who had received resection of paired tissues of primary lung cancers and matched metastases were collected. The protein expression of VEGF, HIF-1α, Met, P53, TGF-β1, Cox-2 and TNF-α between paired tumors was detected by immunohistochemistry. The results showed that there was no statistical significance between primary cancers and matched metastases for the expressions of the selected biomarkers. The p values were more than 0.05. The major concordance of the selected biomarkers existed between paired primary and metastatic tumors. However, there were still minor differences. Differences in metastases compared with primary tumors were observed in respective two cases for VEGF, HIF-1α and Met, respective one case for TGF-β1, COX2 and TNFα and three cases for P53. In conclusion, there were major concordance and minor difference for each biomarker between primary lung tumors and corresponding metastases, which may have important implications for the understanding of current metastasis models and treatment of advanced lung cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.