Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24100460›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2014

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: new therapeutic avenues and blind alleys.

Aikaterini Thanou, Joan T Merrill

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Integrative Analysis of mFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Epigenetic involvement in etiopathogenesis and implications in treatment of systemic lupus erythematous.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aikaterini ThanouArthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 NE 13th Street, MS 22, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Joan T MerrillClinical Pharmacology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, 825 NE 13th Street, MS 22, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite rapid accumulation of knowledge about complex immune dysregulation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and major primary lupus syndromes, and a plethora of promising new treatments reaching preclinical and early clinical studies, advanced-phase trials of new biologic agents have repeatedly failed to achieve their clinical end points. It is possible that none of these agents work, but the accuracy of this suggestion is as unclear as the case for efficacy, owing to issues in the design of studies and the opacity of the data that have resulted. Disease heterogeneity and complexity might be a hurdle that is simply too high to overcome by existing methodological approaches, and the way forward to interpretable trial results remains unclear. Nonetheless, well-characterized patterns of immune pathology are shared by substantial subsets of patients, and selective targeting of one or more relevant immune system molecules seems to offer the promise of safer and more effective treatments. Evolution dictates a more personalized approach to therapy and trial design, but this option seems challenging in the current economic, regulatory and scientific environment. This Review addresses these concerns by considering the progress of some of the investigational treatments targeting key physiological abnormalities in lupus.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityHumansImmunity, InnateImmunotherapyInterferonsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicSignal TransductionInterferons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.