Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24099635›Full record

ArticleRural and remote health

Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among women in rural central Pennsylvania: primary care physicians' perspective.

Lara A Rosenwasser, Jennifer S McCall-Hosenfeld, Carol S Weisman, Marianne M Hillemeier, Amanda N Perry, Cynthia H Chuang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rural and remote health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cross-sectional survey study of primary care clinics on evidence-based colorectal cancer screening intervention use.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Family Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Colorectal Cancer Screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Contrasts in Practices and Perceived Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening by Nurses and Physicians Working in Primary Care Settings in Oman.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lara A RosenwasserPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA. lrosenwasser@hmc.psu.edu.
Jennifer S McCall-Hosenfeld
Carol S Weisman
Marianne M Hillemeier
Amanda N Perry
Cynthia H Chuang
Pennsylvania State University · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

Career Development Program in Women's Health Research at Penn StateK12HD055882 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI WEISMAN, CAROL S · 2007 to 2016
$4.7M
Unintended Pregnancy in Women with Chronic Medical ConditionsK23HD051634 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI CHUANG, CYNTHIA H · 2006 to 2010
$721k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055882NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD051634NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD51634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of death among women in the USA. Rural populations have lower rates of CRC screening than their urban counterparts, and rural women have lower screening rates compared with rural men. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify (1) beliefs of primary care physicians (PCPs) about CRC screening in rural communities, (2) factors that may cause gender disparities in CRC screening in rural areas, and (3) solutions to overcome those barriers.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 PCPs practicing in rural central Pennsylvania. PCPs were asked about their CRC screening practices for women, availability of CRC screening services, reminder systems for CRC screening, and barriers to screening specific to their rural communities and to gender. Thematic analysis was used to identify major themes.

resultsAll 17 PCPs endorsed the importance of CRC screening, but believed that there are barriers to CRC screening specific to women and to rural location. All PCPs identified colonoscopy as their screening method of choice, and generally reported that access to colonoscopy services in their rural areas was not a significant barrier. Barriers to CRC screening for women in rural communities were related to (1) PCPs' CRC screening practices, (2) gender-specific barriers to CRC screening, (3) patient-related barriers, (4) community-related barriers, and (5) physician practice-related barriers. Physicians overwhelmingly identified patient education as necessary for improving CRC screening in their rural communities, but believed that education would have to come from a source outside the rural primary care office due to lack of resources, personnel, and time.

conclusionOverall, the PCPs in this study were motivated to identify ways to improve their ability to engage more eligible patients in CRC screening. These findings suggest several interventions to potentially improve CRC screening for women in rural areas, including encouraging use of other effective CRC screening modalities (eg fecal occult blood testing) when colonoscopy is not possible, systems-based reminders that leverage electronic resources and are not visit-dependent, and public health education campaigns aimed specifically at women in rural communities.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPerceptionRural PopulationAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaPhysicians, Primary CareSex FactorsWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID24099635
PMCPMC4050077
OpenAlexW2237539739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.