Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24099334›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2013

Impact of telehealth on general practice contacts: findings from the whole systems demonstrator cluster randomised trial.

Martin Bardsley, Adam Steventon, Helen Doll

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03713333 (Implementation of High Definition Screening Using Handheld Imaging and Digital Health Technologies Within a Learning Health System to Identify Cardiovascular Disease at the Point-of-care), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03713333 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of High Definition Screening Using Handheld Imaging and Digital Health Technologies Within a Learning Health System to Identify Cardiovascular Disease at the Point-of-care: The ASE-INNOVATE Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorScripps HealthRan2018 to 2020Enrolled374ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension, Heart Failure, Atrial FibrillationArmsDigital Health Device Diagnostics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Experiences of front-line health professionals in the delivery of telehealth: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Telehealth in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin BardsleyThe Nuffield Trust, 59 New Cavendish Street, W1G 7LP London, UK. martin.bardsley@nuffieldtrust.org.uk.
Adam Steventon
Helen Doll

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelehealth is increasingly used in the care of people with long term conditions. Whilst many studies look at the impacts of the technology on hospital use, few look at how it changes contacts with primary care professionals. The aim of this paper was to assess the impacts of home-based telehealth interventions on general practice contacts.

methodSecondary analysis of data from a Department of Health funded cluster-randomised trial with 179 general practices in three areas of England randomly assigned to offer telehealth or usual care to eligible patients. Telehealth included remote exchange of vitals signs and symptoms data between patients and healthcare professionals as part of the continuing management of patients. Usual care reflected the range of services otherwise available in the sites, excluding telehealth. Anonymised data from GP systems were used to construct person level histories for control and intervention patients. We tested for differences in numbers of general practitioner and practice nurse contacts over twelve months and in the number of clinical readings recorded on general practice systems over twelve months.

results3,230 people with diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure were recruited in 2008 and 2009. 1219 intervention and 1098 control cases were available for analysis. No statistically significant differences were detected in the numbers of general practitioner or practice nurse contacts between intervention and control groups during the trial, or in the numbers of clinical readings recorded on the general practice systems.

conclusionsTelehealth did not appear associated with different levels of contact with general practitioners and practice nurses. We note that the way that telehealth impacts on primary care roles may be influenced by a number of other features in the health system. The challenge is to ensure that these systems lead to better integration of care than fragmentation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN43002091.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDiabetes MellitusEnglandFemaleGeneral PracticeHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID24099334
PMCPMC3852608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.