Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24099077›Full record

GuidelineArchives of pathology & laboratory medicine2014

Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

Antonio C Wolff, M Elizabeth H Hammond, David G Hicks, Mitch Dowsett, Lisa M McShane, Kimberly H Allison, Donald C Allred, John M S Bartlett, Michael Bilous, Patrick Fitzgibbons and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07753954 (Imaging to Re-evaluate Elacestrant Clinical Application), which is not on this map. Cited by 527 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
527citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
75.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07753954 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Imaging to Re-evaluate Elacestrant Clinical Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorJules Bordet InstituteRan2026 to 2031Enrolled160ConditionsER+ / HER2- Advanced Breast CancerArmsElacestrant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

527 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,784 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Effects of HER Family-targeting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on Antibody-dependent Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity in HER2-expressing Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  17. Article
  18. A modular framework for antibody-drug conjugate biomarkers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

467 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 15 institutions in 4 countries.

Antonio C WolffAntonio C. Wolff, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore; Lisa M. McShane, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT; David G. Hicks, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; Mitch Dowsett, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Kimberly H. Allison, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford; Patrick Fitzgibbons, St Jude Medical Center, Fullerton; Michael F. Press, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Donald C. Allred, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; John M.S. Bartlett, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Wedad Hanna, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Michael Bilous, University of Western Sydney and Healthscope Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Robert B. Jenkins, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Pamela B. Mangu, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Soonmyung Paik, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pitsburgh, PA; Edith A. Perez, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Patricia A. Spears, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; Gail H. Vance, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN; Giuseppe Viale, University of Milan, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; and Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Care Center, Ann Arbor, MI.
M Elizabeth H Hammond
David G Hicks
Mitch Dowsett
Lisa M McShane
Kimberly H Allison
Donald C Allred
John M S Bartlett
Michael Bilous
Patrick Fitzgibbons
Wedad Hanna
Robert B Jenkins
Pamela B Mangu
Soonmyung Paik
Edith A Perez
Michael F Press
Patricia A Spears
Gail H Vance
Giuseppe Viale
Daniel F Hayes
American Society of Clinical Oncology
College of American Pathologists
Intermountain Healthcare · USAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology · USIndiana University · USJacksonville College · USMayo Clinic · USNorth Carolina State University · USNSABP Foundation · USOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAStanford University · USSt. Jude Medical Center · USUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Toronto · CAWashington University in St. Louis · USWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Breast Cancer Now BREAST CANCER NOW RESEARCH CENTRENCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer.

methodsASCO/CAP convened an Update Committee that included coauthors of the 2007 guideline to conduct a systematic literature review and update recommendations for optimal HER2 testing.

resultsThe Update Committee identified criteria and areas requiring clarification to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). The guideline was reviewed and approved by both organizations. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to >10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesMammary Glands, HumanNeoplasm ProteinsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNeoplasm InvasivenessPredictive Value of TestsSocieties, MedicalSystematic Reviews as TopicUnited StatesBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24099077
PMCPMC4086638
OpenAlexW1974685860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.