Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24099033›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2014

New bio-ceramization processes applied to vegetable hierarchical structures for bone regeneration: an experimental model in sheep.

Giuseppe Filardo, Elizaveta Kon, Anna Tampieri, Rafael Cabezas-Rodríguez, Alessandro Di Martino, Milena Fini, Gianluca Giavaresi, Marco Lelli, Julian Martínez-Fernández, Lucia Martini and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances with Platelet-Rich Plasma for Bone Healing.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Biomaterials for bone regeneration: an orthopedic and dentistry overview.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Annealing and NMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Nanostructured Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Giuseppe Filardo1 Laboratory of Biomechanics, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute , Bologna, Italy .
Elizaveta Kon
Anna Tampieri
Rafael Cabezas-Rodríguez
Alessandro Di Martino
Milena Fini
Gianluca Giavaresi
Marco Lelli
Julian Martínez-Fernández
Lucia Martini
Joaquin Ramírez-Rico
Francesca Salamanna
Monica Sandri
Simone Sprio
Maurilio Marcacci
Laboratoire Innovations Technologiques pour la Détection et le Diagnostic · FROrthopedic Institute · USUniversidad de Sevilla · ESIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITNational Research Council · ITInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone loss is still a major problem in orthopedics. The purpose of this experimental study is to evaluate the safety and regenerative potential of a new scaffold based on a bio-ceramization process for bone regeneration in long diaphyseal defects in a sheep model. The scaffold was obtained by transformation of wood pieces into porous biomorphic silicon carbide (BioSiC®). The process enabled the maintenance of the original wood microstructure, thus exhibiting hierarchically organized porosity and high mechanical strength. To improve cell adhesion and osseointegration, the external surface of the hollow cylinder was made more bioactive by electrodeposition of a uniform layer of collagen fibers that were mineralized with biomimetic hydroxyapatite, whereas the internal part was filled with a bio-hybrid HA/collagen composite. The final scaffold was then implanted in the metatarsus of 15 crossbred (Merinos-Sarda) adult sheep, divided into 3 groups: scaffold alone, scaffold with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation, and scaffold with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) added during implantation. Radiological analysis was performed at 4, 8, 12 weeks, and 4 months, when animals were sacrificed for the final radiological, histological, and histomorphometric evaluation. In all tested treatments, these analyses highlighted the presence of newly formed bone at the bone scaffolds' interface. Although a lack of substantial effect of PRP was demonstrated, the scaffold+BMSC augmentation showed the highest value of bone-to-implant contact and new bone growth inside the scaffold. The findings of this study suggest the potential of bio-ceramization processes applied to vegetable hierarchical structures for the production of wood-derived bone scaffolds, and document a suitable augmentation procedure in enhancing bone regeneration, particularly when combined with BMSCs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationCarbon Compounds, InorganicCeramicsCollagenDurapatiteMechanical PhenomenaMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningModels, AnimalOsseointegrationOsteotomyPeriosteumProsthesis ImplantationSheepSilicon CompoundsBiocompatible MaterialsCarbon Compounds, InorganicCollagenDurapatitesilicon carbideSilicon Compounds

Identifiers

PMID24099033
PMCPMC3927717
OpenAlexW2036111329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.