Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24098770›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Comparison of three intervention models for promoting circumcision among migrant workers in western China to reduce local sexual transmission of HIV.

Chuanyi Ning, Junjun Jiang, Li Ye, Xiaobo Yang, Bo Wei, Wei Deng, Suosu Wei, Jiegang Huang, Bo Qin, Halmurat Upur and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chuanyi NingSchool of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China ; Guangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Junjun Jiang
Li Ye
Xiaobo Yang
Bo Wei
Wei Deng
Suosu Wei
Jiegang Huang
Bo Qin
Halmurat Upur
Chaohui Zhong
Qianqiu Wang
Qian Wang
Yuhua Ruan
Fumei Wei
Na Xu
Peiyan Xie
Jenny H Hsi
Yiming Shao
Hao Liang
Guangxi Medical University · CNNational Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention,China CDC · CNChongqing Medical University · CNXinjiang Medical University · CNChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThree models for promoting male circumcision (MC) as a preventative intervention against HIV infection were compared among migrant worker populations in western China.

methodsA cohort study was performed after an initial cross-sectional survey among migrant workers in three provincial level districts with high HIV prevalence in western China. A total of 1,670 HIV seronegative male migrants were cluster-randomized into three intervention models, in which the dissemination of promotional materials and expert- and volunteer-led discussions are conducted in one, two, and three stage interventions. Changes in knowledge of MC, acceptability of MC, MC surgery uptake, and the costs of implementation were analyzed at 6-month and 9-month follow-up visits.

resultsAll three models significantly increased the participants' knowledge about MC. The three-stage model significantly increased the acceptability of MC among participants and led to greatest increase in MC uptake. At the end of follow-up, 9.2% (153/1,670) of participants underwent MC surgery; uptake among the one-, two-, and three-stage models were 4.9%, 9.3%, and 14.6%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that three-stage model was the most effective method to scale up MC, with RR = 2.0 (95% CI, 1.3-3.1, P=0.002) compared to the on-site session model. The two-stage intervention model showed no significant difference with either the on-site session model (RR=1.5, 95% CI, 0.92-2.4, P=0.12) or three-stage model (P=0.10).

conclusionsA three-stage intervention with gradual introduction of knowledge led to the significantly increase in MC uptake among migrant workers in western China, and was also the most cost-effective method among the three models.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsChinaCircumcision, MaleCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24098770
PMCPMC3786908
OpenAlexW2067648212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.