ArticlePloS one2013
Concurrent gene signatures for han chinese breast cancers.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of datasets that can help elucidate relationships among gene expression, race, and immunohistochemistry-defined subtypes in breast cancer.Cancer biology & therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Integrating RNA-seq and scRNA-seq to explore the prognostic features and immune landscape of exosome-related genes in breast cancer metastasis.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- The Duality of Collagens in Metastases of Solid Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Loss of COL20A1 in Schwann Cells Alters Regeneration of the Neuromuscular Junction and Locomotor Activity in Mice.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025Article
- Article
- UnveilingBiomedicines · 2024Article
- Aberrant expression of collagen type X in solid tumor stroma is associated with EMT, immunosuppressive and pro-metastatic pathways, bone marrow stromal cell signatures, and poor survival prognosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Adenylate cyclase 9 expression level is associated with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and predicts patient prognosis.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Strengths and limitations of non-disclosive data analysis: a comparison of breast cancer survival classifiers using VisualSHIELD.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- O-GlcNAcylation promotes topoisomerase IIα catalytic activity in breast cancer chemoresistance.EMBO reports · 2023Article
- Cuproptosis engages in c-Myc-mediated breast cancer stemness.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- NAD+ biosynthesis metabolism predicts prognosis and indicates immune microenvironment for breast cancer.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2023Article
- TRPML2 Mucolipin Channels Drive the Response of Glioma Stem Cells to Temozolomide and Affect the Overall Survival in Glioblastoma Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Coexpression of TRPML1 and TRPML2 Mucolipin Channels Affects the Survival of Glioblastoma Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Colorectal cancer concurrent gene signature based on coherent patterns between genomic and transcriptional alterations.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Reduced miR-371b-5p expression drives tumor progression via CSDE1/RAC1 regulation in triple-negative breast cancer.Oncogene · 2022Article
- Type XX Collagen Is Elevated in Circulation of Patients with Solid Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Decision Theory versus Conventional Statistics for Personalized Therapy of Breast Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Functional In Vitro Assessment of VEGFA/NOTCH2 Signaling Pathway and pRB Proteasomal Degradation and the Clinical Relevance of Mucolipin TRPML2 Overexpression in Glioblastoma Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Impact of RSUME Actions on Biomolecular Modifications in Physio-Pathological Processes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interplay between copy number variation (CNV) and differential gene expression may be able to shed light on molecular process underlying breast cancer and lead to the discovery of cancer-related genes. In the current study, genes concurrently identified in array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and gene expression microarrays were used to derive gene signatures for Han Chinese breast cancers. We performed 23 array CGHs and 81 gene expression microarrays in breast cancer samples from Taiwanese women. Genes with coherent patterns of both CNV and differential gene expression were identified from the 21 samples assayed using both platforms. We used these genes to derive signatures associated with clinical ER and HER2 status and disease-free survival. DISTRIBUTIONS OF SIGNATURE GENES WERE STRONGLY ASSOCIATED WITH CHROMOSOMAL LOCATION: chromosome 16 for ER and 17 for HER2. A breast cancer risk predictive model was built based on the first supervised principal component from 16 genes (RCAN3, MCOLN2, DENND2D, RWDD3, ZMYM6, CAPZA1, GPR18, WARS2, TRIM45, SCRN1, CSNK1E, HBXIP, CSDE1, MRPL20, IKZF1, and COL20A1), and distinct survival patterns were observed between the high- and low-risk groups from the combined dataset of 408 microarrays. The risk score was significantly higher in breast cancer patients with recurrence, metastasis, or mortality than in relapse-free individuals (0.241 versus 0, P<0.001). The concurrent gene risk predictive model remained discriminative across distinct clinical ER and HER2 statuses in subgroup analysis. Prognostic comparisons with published gene expression signatures showed a better discerning ability of concurrent genes, many of which were rarely identifiable if expression data were pre-selected by phenotype correlations or variability of individual genes. We conclude that parallel analysis of CGH and microarray data, in conjunction with known gene expression patterns, can be used to identify biomarkers with prognostic values in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.