Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24098469›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Creatine supplementation associated or not with strength training upon emotional and cognitive measures in older women: a randomized double-blind study.

Christiano Robles Rodrigues Alves, Carlos Alberto Abujabra Merege Filho, Fabiana Braga Benatti, Sonia Brucki, Rosa Maria R Pereira, Ana Lucia de Sá Pinto, Fernanda Rodrigues Lima, Hamilton Roschel, Bruno Gualano

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01164020 (Creatine Supplementation and Cognition), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01164020 nacompletednot on this map

Creatine Supplementation and Cognition

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2010 to 2012Enrolled56ConditionsCognition, AgingArmscreatine supplementation, Placebo (Dextrose), Resistance training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Impact of creatine supplementation and exercise training in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Review
  19. Creatine monohydrate supplementation for older adults and clinical populations.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christiano Robles Rodrigues AlvesSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Alberto Abujabra Merege Filho
Fabiana Braga Benatti
Sonia Brucki
Rosa Maria R Pereira
Ana Lucia de Sá Pinto
Fernanda Rodrigues Lima
Hamilton Roschel
Bruno Gualano
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the effects of creatine supplementation, associated or not with strength training, upon emotional and cognitive measures in older woman.

methodsThis is a 24-week, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The individuals were randomly allocated into one of the following groups (n=14 each): 1) placebo, 2) creatine supplementation, 3) placebo associated with strength training or 4) creatine supplementation associated with strength training. According to their allocation, the participants were given creatine (4 x 5 g/d for 5 days followed by 5 g/d) or placebo (dextrose at the same dosage) and were strength trained or not. Cognitive function, assessed by a comprehensive battery of tests involving memory, selective attention, and inhibitory control, and emotional measures, assessed by the Geriatric Depression Scale, were evaluated at baseline, after 12 and 24 weeks of the intervention. Muscle strength and food intake were evaluated at baseline and after 24 weeks.

resultsAfter the 24-week intervention, both training groups (ingesting creatine supplementation and placebo) had significant reductions on the Geriatric Depression Scale scores when compared with the non-trained placebo group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively) and the non-trained creatine group (p < 0.001 for both comparison). However, no significant differences were observed between the non-trained placebo and creatine (p = 0.60) groups, or between the trained placebo and creatine groups (p = 0.83). Both trained groups, irrespective of creatine supplementation, had better muscle strength performance than the non-trained groups. Neither strength training nor creatine supplementation altered any parameter of cognitive performance. Food intake remained unchanged.

conclusionCreatine supplementation did not promote any significant change in cognitive function and emotional parameters in apparently healthy older individuals. In addition, strength training per se improved emotional state and muscle strength, but not cognition, with no additive effects of creatine supplementation.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01164020.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsResistance TrainingAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCognitionCreatineDietDouble-Blind MethodEmotionsFemaleHumansMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthNeuropsychological TestsCreatine

Identifiers

PMID24098469
PMCPMC3789718
OpenAlexW2072529815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.