ArticlePloS one2013
Transcriptome comparison of human neurons generated using induced pluripotent stem cells derived from dental pulp and skin fibroblasts.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- AnFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
- Effect of Ascorbic Acid on Differentiation, Secretome and Stemness of Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Tooth (SHEDs).Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Sinking Our Teeth in Getting Dental Stem Cells to Clinics for Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The Use of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells as a Model for Developmental Eye Disorders.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020Article
- Assessing drug response in engineered brain microenvironments.Brain research bulletin · 2019Review
- Regenerative Models for the Integration and Regeneration of Head Skeletal Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Integrated multifactor analysis explores core dysfunctional modules in autism spectrum disorder.International journal of biological sciences · 2018Article
- On the Viability and Potential Value of Stem Cells for Repair and Treatment of Central Neurotrauma: Overview and Speculations.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Review
- Significant transcriptional changes in 15q duplication but not Angelman syndrome deletion stem cell-derived neurons.Molecular autism · 2018Article
- Dental pulp stem cells for the study of neurogenetic disorders.Human molecular genetics · 2017Review
- Using induced pluripotent stem cells derived neurons to model brain diseases.Neural regeneration research · 2017Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated heterozygous knockout of the autism gene CHD8 and characterization of its transcriptional networks in cerebral organoids derived from iPS cells.Molecular autism · 2017Article
- Integrative transcriptome network analysis of iPSC-derived neurons from schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder patients with 22q11.2 deletion.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Article
- Transcriptomics analysis of iPSC-derived neurons and modeling of neuropsychiatric disorders.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2016Review
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2016Review
- Biomedical Application of Dental Tissue-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2016Review
- A Dishful of a Troubled Mind: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Psychiatric Research.Stem cells international · 2016Review
- Regenerative Applications Using Tooth Derived Stem Cells in Other Than Tooth Regeneration: A Literature Review.Stem cells international · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology is providing an opportunity to study neuropsychiatric disorders through the capacity to grow patient-specific neurons in vitro. Skin fibroblasts obtained by biopsy have been the most reliable source of cells for reprogramming. However, using other somatic cells obtained by less invasive means would be ideal, especially in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and other neurodevelopmental conditions. In addition to fibroblasts, iPSCs have been developed from cord blood, lymphocytes, hair keratinocytes, and dental pulp from deciduous teeth. Of these, dental pulp would be a good source for neurodevelopmental disorders in children because obtaining material is non-invasive. We investigated its suitability for disease modeling by carrying out gene expression profiling, using RNA-seq, on differentiated neurons derived from iPSCs made from dental pulp extracted from deciduous teeth (T-iPSCs) and fibroblasts (F-iPSCs). This is the first RNA-seq analysis comparing gene expression profiles in neurons derived from iPSCs made from different somatic cells. For the most part, gene expression profiles were quite similar with only 329 genes showing differential expression at a nominally significant p-value (p<0.05), of which 63 remained significant after correcting for genome-wide analysis (FDR <0.05). The most striking difference was the lower level of expression detected for numerous members of the all four HOX gene families in neurons derived from T-iPSCs. In addition, an increased level of expression was seen for several transcription factors expressed in the developing forebrain (FOXP2, OTX1, and LHX2, for example). Overall, pathway analysis revealed that differentially expressed genes that showed higher levels of expression in neurons derived from T-iPSCs were enriched for genes implicated in schizophrenia (SZ). The findings suggest that neurons derived from T-iPSCs are suitable for disease-modeling neuropsychiatric disorder and may have some advantages over those derived from F-iPSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.