Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24098389›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Phenological changes in the southern hemisphere.

Lynda E Chambers, Res Altwegg, Christophe Barbraud, Phoebe Barnard, Linda J Beaumont, Robert J M Crawford, Joel M Durant, Lesley Hughes, Marie R Keatley, Matt Low and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Lynda E ChambersCentre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Res Altwegg
Christophe Barbraud
Phoebe Barnard
Linda J Beaumont
Robert J M Crawford
Joel M Durant
Lesley Hughes
Marie R Keatley
Matt Low
Patricia C Morellato
Elvira S Poloczanska
Valeria Ruoppolo
Ralph E T Vanstreels
Eric J Woehler
Anton C Wolfaardt
Macquarie University · AUSouth African National Biodiversity Institute · ZACentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé · FRCity of Cape Town · ZACollaboration for Australian Weather and Climate Research · AUCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere · AUInternational Fund for Animal Welfare · USJoint Nature Conservation Committee · GBSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current evidence of phenological responses to recent climate change is substantially biased towards northern hemisphere temperate regions. Given regional differences in climate change, shifts in phenology will not be uniform across the globe, and conclusions drawn from temperate systems in the northern hemisphere might not be applicable to other regions on the planet. We conduct the largest meta-analysis to date of phenological drivers and trends among southern hemisphere species, assessing 1208 long-term datasets from 89 studies on 347 species. Data were mostly from Australasia (Australia and New Zealand), South America and the Antarctic/subantarctic, and focused primarily on plants and birds. This meta-analysis shows an advance in the timing of spring events (with a strong Australian data bias), although substantial differences in trends were apparent among taxonomic groups and regions. When only statistically significant trends were considered, 82% of terrestrial datasets and 42% of marine datasets demonstrated an advance in phenology. Temperature was most frequently identified as the primary driver of phenological changes; however, in many studies it was the only climate variable considered. When precipitation was examined, it often played a key role but, in contrast with temperature, the direction of phenological shifts in response to precipitation variation was difficult to predict a priori. We discuss how phenological information can inform the adaptive capacity of species, their resilience, and constraints on autonomous adaptation. We also highlight serious weaknesses in past and current data collection and analyses at large regional scales (with very few studies in the tropics or from Africa) and dramatic taxonomic biases. If accurate predictions regarding the general effects of climate change on the biology of organisms are to be made, data collection policies focussing on targeting data-deficient regions and taxa need to be financially and logistically supported.

Indexed as

Earth, PlanetEcological and Environmental PhenomenaAnimalsAquatic OrganismsClassificationClimateClimate ChangeSeasonsStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID24098389
PMCPMC3787957
OpenAlexW2114534800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.