Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24098144›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

Direct monitoring of the strand passage reaction of DNA topoisomerase II triggers checkpoint activation.

Katherine L Furniss, Hung-Ji Tsai, Jo Ann W Byl, Andrew B Lane, Amit C Vas, Wei-Shan Hsu, Neil Osheroff, Duncan J Clarke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Sister chromatids separate during anaphase in a three-stage program as directed by interaxis bridges.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Topology-Centric View on Mitotic Chromosome Architecture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  9. Non-Catalytic Roles of the Topoisomerase IIα C-Terminal Domain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel kinetochore function of Topoisomerase IIα.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine L FurnissDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology & Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Hung-Ji Tsai
Jo Ann W Byl
Andrew B Lane
Amit C Vas
Wei-Shan Hsu
Neil Osheroff
Duncan J Clarke
University of Minnesota · USVanderbilt University · USInstitut thématique Génétique, génomique et bioinformatique · FR

Funding

FUNCTION AND BIOLOGY OF EUKARYOTIC DNA TOPOISOMERASESR01GM033944 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI OSHEROFF, NEIL · 1985 to 2015
$5.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM033944NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM033944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By necessity, the ancient activity of type II topoisomerases co-evolved with the double-helical structure of DNA, at least in organisms with circular genomes. In humans, the strand passage reaction of DNA topoisomerase II (Topo II) is the target of several major classes of cancer drugs which both poison Topo II and activate cell cycle checkpoint controls. It is important to know the cellular effects of molecules that target Topo II, but the mechanisms of checkpoint activation that respond to Topo II dysfunction are not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that a checkpoint mechanism monitors the strand passage reaction of Topo II. In contrast, cells do not become checkpoint arrested in the presence of the aberrant DNA topologies, such as hyper-catenation, that arise in the absence of Topo II activity. An overall reduction in Topo II activity (i.e. slow strand passage cycles) does not activate the checkpoint, but specific defects in the T-segment transit step of the strand passage reaction do induce a cell cycle delay. Furthermore, the cell cycle delay depends on the divergent and catalytically inert C-terminal region of Topo II, indicating that transmission of a checkpoint signal may occur via the C-terminus. Other, well characterized, mitotic checkpoints detect DNA lesions or monitor unattached kinetochores; these defects arise via failures in a variety of cell processes. In contrast, we have described the first example of a distinct category of checkpoint mechanism that monitors the catalytic cycle of a single specific enzyme in order to determine when chromosome segregation can proceed faithfully.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2Chromosome SegregationDNADNA Topoisomerases, Type IIHumansKinetochoresMad2 ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DNADNA Topoisomerases, Type IIMad2 ProteinsMAD2 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD53 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24098144
PMCPMC3789831
OpenAlexW1993478070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.