Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24097867›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2013

Phase I study of panobinostat plus everolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma.

Yasuhiro Oki, Daniela Buglio, Michelle Fanale, Luis Fayad, Amanda Copeland, Jorge Romaguera, Larry W Kwak, Barbara Pro, Silvana de Castro Faria, Sattva Neelapu and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Recent Update of HDAC Inhibitors in Lymphoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  16. Genetic alterations and their clinical implications in DLBCL.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  17. Advances in Molecular Biology and Targeted Therapy of Mantle Cell Lymphoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Emerging epigenetic-modulating therapies in lymphoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasuhiro OkiAuthors' Affiliations: Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Diagnostic Imaging, and Biostatistics, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Daniela Buglio
Michelle Fanale
Luis Fayad
Amanda Copeland
Jorge Romaguera
Larry W Kwak
Barbara Pro
Silvana de Castro Faria
Sattva Neelapu
Nathan Fowler
Fredrick Hagemeister
Jiexin Zhang
Shouhao Zhou
Lei Feng
Anas Younes
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Lymphoma SPOREP50CA136411 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BERRY, DONALD A · 2009 to 2011
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of panobinostat plus everolimus in patients with relapsed Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The concept was supported by the single-agent clinical activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors, and on the in vitro mechanism-based synergistic antiproliferative activity. EXPERIMENTAL

designThis was a phase I study in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma using panobinostat orally on Monday/Wednesday/Friday and everolimus orally daily. Toxicity and responses were assessed in dose-escalation cohort followed by expansion cohort at maximum-tolerated dose. Exploratory analysis of serum cytokine levels was performed.

resultsThirty patients were enrolled onto four dose levels. The dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia. The maximal tolerated dose was panobinostat 20 mg and everolimus 10 mg. Grade 3/4 toxicity included thrombocytopenia (64%), neutropenia (47%), anemia (20%), infection (10%), fatigue (7%), and dyspnea (7%). A total of 10 patients (33%; indolent lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma) achieved objective responses. In patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 14), the overall response rate was 43% with complete response rate of 15%. In patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple serum cytokine levels decreased significantly after treatment with this combination therapy. Of note, clinical responses were associated with a decrease in serum interleukin-5 levels (day 8, P = 0.013, and day 15, P = 0.021).

conclusionsOur data suggest that the combination therapy is active but with significant thrombocytopenia. Future studies should explore alternate scheduling and different compounds that target the same pathways to improve the tolerability of this novel combination.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug Administration ScheduleEverolimusFemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHodgkin DiseaseHumansHydroxamic AcidsIndolesInterleukin-5Lymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedEverolimusHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsIndolesInterleukin-5MTOR protein, humanPanobinostatSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID24097867
PMCPMC4409814
OpenAlexW2128783106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.